BH-5 back from the dead!!!! - Page 2

jmke · 27th January 2005, 14:14

http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=2 58

27th January 2005, 15:19

yes, your point being?

jmke · 27th January 2005, 16:46

that BH-5 is still capable

27th January 2005, 22:57

still capable of what?

have you been drinking? Or are you to smart for me, because I don't know what your talking about?

jmke · 28th January 2005, 01:27

is still capable of providing an extremely fast system, or in other words: it has not been outdone by TCCD yet. TCCD relies on super high FSB speeds to gain the advantage, only few systems will reach 300FSB or more, while 265-275Mhz is more feasible

28th January 2005, 07:29

in my humble opinion every ( or most ) TCCD can handle 300+ fsb it's just the a64 memory controller that keeps us away from 300+

jmke · 28th January 2005, 09:55

Quote:

Originally posted by jmke
only few systems will reach 300FSB or more, while 265-275Mhz is more feasible

28th January 2005, 18:22

Quote:

Originally posted by Da_BoKa
in my humble opinion every ( or most ) TCCD can handle 300+ fsb it's just the a64 memory controller that keeps us away from 300+

are you sure? I know the memcontroller should take care of the ram but couldn't it still be the chipset and/or the bios?

I don't have two different mobo's so I can't find out.

maybe I can verify with a friend who has an epox 9nda3+ and a 3500+. he can't get over 270 htt, even with the latest bios .
his ram isn't on it's but, neither is the cpu.

28th January 2005, 23:56

yes i am sure!

31st January 2005, 12:39

Does this mean the modules with TCCD chips may drop in price?

27th January 2005, 14:14	#11
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=2 58 __________________

27th January 2005, 16:46	#13
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	that BH-5 is still capable __________________

28th January 2005, 01:27	#15
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	is still capable of providing an extremely fast system, or in other words: it has not been outdone by TCCD yet. TCCD relies on super high FSB speeds to gain the advantage, only few systems will reach 300FSB or more, while 265-275Mhz is more feasible __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
The reasons you need to buy Left 4 Dead 2 on PC	jmke	WebNews	1	19th November 2009 17:49
Intel pushes back Pine Trail-D platform and Clarkdale CPUs to 1Q10	jmke	WebNews	0	24th July 2009 12:06
Dead mainboards	geoffrey	Mad Bargains	11	12th January 2008 14:05
Looking Back - The 6800 Ultra, ForceWare, and the Future	jmke	WebNews	0	11th May 2006 10:52
Howto investigate your LCD display for dead pixels	Sidney	WebNews	2	24th July 2005 18:19
And another dead TI4600	biCker	General Madness - System Building Advice	31	25th September 2002 21:01

27th January 2005, 15:19	#12
Da_BoKa Posts: n/a	yes, your point being?

27th January 2005, 22:57	#14
Da_BoKa Posts: n/a	still capable of what? have you been drinking? Or are you to smart for me, because I don't know what your talking about?

28th January 2005, 07:29	#16
Da_BoKa Posts: n/a	in my humble opinion every ( or most ) TCCD can handle 300+ fsb it's just the a64 memory controller that keeps us away from 300+

28th January 2005, 23:56	#19
Da_BoKa Posts: n/a	yes i am sure!

31st January 2005, 12:39	#20
Wolf2000me Posts: n/a	Does this mean the modules with TCCD chips may drop in price?