| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #61 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() i think all of us here already knew that value ram wouldn't be able to hit 270HTT, even with those dividers |
![]() |
![]() | #62 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() Why not? The dividers should have the ram running about 178 which is below its rated 200 so I don't see what the problem is. Can you explain? |
![]() |
![]() | #63 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() no, i wouldn't really have an idea why, maybe it isn't fully compatible with your mobo, but as i said, i wouldn't have a clue |
![]() |
![]() | #64 | |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,010
![]() | ![]() Quote:
if you are using dividers you let the ram run slower then your HTT, and the only advantage this can have, is that you can clock your CPU higher if you don't have an Athlon FX, which means you'll be stuck with a maximum multiplier. there is no other advantage of increasing your HTT and using dividers in my humble opinion
__________________ ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #65 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() JMKE, That's what I thought. The only two other possibilities that occur to me are: The PQI Turbo ram I could hit 270 with was single sided whereas the value ram is double sided. Since there is no Bank Interleave control in the bios of my VNF4, I think this might be affecting my OC potential. I might need to get some single sided 512 MB modules if this is the problem but I'm not sure if those are made. The only other thing that occurs to me is that maybe the PCB is causing problems but I am totally ignorant of how the PCB affects ram performance. Any suggestions? |
![]() |
![]() | #66 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() lol, indeed you are right jmke, duno what i was thinking when i wrote that ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | #67 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() That's what I think Gibson which could be a problem then if the bank interleave is what is causing the issue. |
![]() |
![]() | #68 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() i guess switching to 2*256 isn't really a good option eh, 512 is not enough these days i think, btw, are you sure there aren't any bank interleave options? (sometimes motherboard makers hide certain advanced options to keep things tidy) |
![]() |
![]() | #69 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() I've looked, believe me. Only other option is to get a different mobo but I'm not sure which one. This Chaintech VNF4 was pretty inexpensive, $85, so trying to find something that OCs well at a low price will be a little tricky. Any recommendations for an NF4 Ultra mobo? |
![]() |
![]() | #70 |
Posts: n/a
| ![]() the DFI nf4 ultra should be good for oc'ing, it runs at +-130€ atm, it's a bit more, but i bet you get a lot more extra's too personally i'm planning to buy a DFI nf4 SLI-DR in july |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OCZ PC2-6400 ReaperX HPC Enhanced Bandwidth 4GB Memory | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 5th January 2008 17:34 |
Rambus Aims for Terabyte-Per-Second Memory Bandwidth | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th November 2007 14:20 |
Memory Bandwidth & Capacities | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 24th October 2005 00:44 |
Memory Bandwidth vs. Latency Timings | Sidney | WebNews | 1 | 13th September 2005 15:13 |
Athlon 64 X2: New Memory Dividers and Multitasking Performance | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 13th August 2005 17:46 |
AMD Athlon 64 Processors on E Core: Memory Controller Peculiarities in Detail | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 1st August 2005 09:33 |
Memory Bandwidth Shootout - pt.1 | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 16th March 2005 01:47 |
Athlon 64 Memory: Rewriting the Rules | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 2nd October 2004 02:47 |
OCZ Announces PC-3700 Enhanced Bandwidth DDR Memory | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 21st April 2004 13:09 |
Memory Bandwidth vs. Latency Timings | jmke | WebNews | 9 | 13th November 2003 13:25 |
Thread Tools | |
| |