It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > Articles & Howto's
Bursting the Athlon 64 Memory bandwidth bubble Bursting the Athlon 64 Memory bandwidth bubble
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Bursting the Athlon 64 Memory bandwidth bubble
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 25th May 2005, 14:59   #31
perdomot
 
Posts: n/a
Default

JMKE,
Well, I already spent some bread getting myself a Raptor and a 6600GT vid card so I think my rig will be plenty fast in those departments. I was wondering if you could test the effects of changing the different dividers available on the mobo without changing the multi/HTT. As an example, I am running at 255 X 9 and using the 133 divider to keep the ram below 200. Would getting memory that would allow me to use the 166 divider show any improvement in gaming or encoding? I don't recall any reviews that tested the effects of dividers on the performance of a rig. Thanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2005, 15:28   #32
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

dividers test @ [M] http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=22 6
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th May 2005, 17:29   #33
[M] Reviewer
 
Gamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,587
Gamer Freshly Registered
Default

can't use dividers, don't know why....

but you get the idea from the post above
__________________
Gamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2005, 03:20   #34
perdomot
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looks like the divider doesn't make much difference either. Guess the game is being able to get the highest megahertz possible.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2005, 03:50   #35
Member
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

No, it does not matter; and not much even with tight timing.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2005, 21:16   #36
GIBSON
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jmke
hey perdomot; CPU intensive tasks which rely solely (or mostly) on the CPU alone will show benefits; but this increase will not be that impressive either.

I would advise to spend money on faster HDD, videocard, burner, etc, before buying speedier RAM; or maybe consider buying MORE ram; as having more does not hurt, and you might be able to run a RAMDISK and increase performance tenfold
another interesting thing to do when you have 1G or more of ram is to load the windows core into your ram, it's a simple reg edit, from what i've heard it gives quite the boost
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2005, 22:04   #37
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

have any links/docs on this? might be worth trying out and reporting the results
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2005, 22:45   #38
GIBSON
 
Posts: n/a
Default

well, i shouldn't be telling you this i think, but anyhow, a mate of mine made an optimised version of windows xp, i still have the reg file somewhere on my comp which has most of the reg edits, one of them in there is the one i talked about, i'll search it and i'll give you the edit, maybe something to be tested by [M] maybe it might help out on certain benchmarks too? (for those benchlovers out there )
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2005, 22:51   #39
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Keep the core system in RAM

Windows XP takes portions of the operating system, applications, and data files that aren't currently needed in RAM and temporarily stores the data on the hard disk in the paging file. During a normal computing session, Windows regularly moves data back and forth from RAM and the paging file.

If you have a considerable amount of RAM in your system--512 MB or more--you can improve system performance by preventing the OS from sending user-mode and kernel-mode drivers, as well as kernel-mode system code, to the paging file.

You can do so by changing a setting in the registry. Here's how:


Launch the Registry Editor (Regedit.exe).
Go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\
Session Manager\Memory Management.
Double-click DisablePagingExecutive DWORD value.
Change the value in the Value Data text box from 0 to 1, and click OK.
Close the Registry Editor.

You may need to restart the system or log out of Windows XP for the change to take effect.

Note: Editing the registry is risky, so be sure you have a verified backup before making any changes.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th May 2005, 22:56   #40
GIBSON
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yes, that should be it, anyhow, i've added a reg file that should do the trick
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OCZ PC2-6400 ReaperX HPC Enhanced Bandwidth 4GB Memory Sidney WebNews 0 5th January 2008 17:34
Rambus Aims for Terabyte-Per-Second Memory Bandwidth jmke WebNews 0 26th November 2007 14:20
Memory Bandwidth & Capacities jmke WebNews 1 24th October 2005 00:44
Memory Bandwidth vs. Latency Timings Sidney WebNews 1 13th September 2005 15:13
Athlon 64 X2: New Memory Dividers and Multitasking Performance jmke WebNews 1 13th August 2005 17:46
AMD Athlon 64 Processors on E Core: Memory Controller Peculiarities in Detail jmke WebNews 0 1st August 2005 09:33
Memory Bandwidth Shootout - pt.1 Sidney WebNews 0 16th March 2005 01:47
Athlon 64 Memory: Rewriting the Rules jmke WebNews 2 2nd October 2004 02:47
OCZ Announces PC-3700 Enhanced Bandwidth DDR Memory jmke WebNews 0 21st April 2004 13:09
Memory Bandwidth vs. Latency Timings jmke WebNews 9 13th November 2003 13:25

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO