It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > Articles & Howto's
AMD FX 8150 Revisited AMD FX 8150 Revisited
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


AMD FX 8150 Revisited
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2nd November 2011, 07:18   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 46,447
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default AMD FX 8150 Revisited

After the hectic week of testing this brand new 8 core CPU from Advanced Micro Design, it's time to go a bit deeper. In this review we are gonna retest the Bulldozer CPU versus it's main rivals. Being AMD's own Thuban 1090T, Intels 2600K and the almighty Gulftown 990X CPU. Mainly because our test suite had to be slightly updated to give the new Zambezi architecture a shot to maybe show it's true potential. But most important to show some people the real deal. I've myself read through a few articles on AMD's latest flagship. To be honest some reviews made me wonder if they were really done or just a copy paste of the marketing slides. It was also kind of funny to see some renown websites include completely GPU bottlenecked game benchmarks. Kinda hard to tell the importance of the CPU part don't you think ? Even if they call it real world scenarios, it still made my eyebrows frown as they hardly used any game tests in older reviews. Why now include them ? So without boring you too much with my frustrations, let's get it on...

http://www.madshrimps.be/articles/article/1000226/
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 08:52   #2
Member
 
Teemto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Duffel
Posts: 539
Teemto Fully Registered
Default

Always been a fan of AMD, but Bulldozer can only be described as one thing:
Epic fail.
__________________
1999 First home made PC: Celeron 500 * Abit BE6 * Diamond Viper v770 32MB *Quantum Fireball KA 18GB ATA-66 * 64MB SDRAM * Philips 107SX 17" * 50x CD-ROM * Win98
Teemto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 12:12   #3
cesariuth
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why you test only benchmark??
some space for test soft of the real world?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 13:43   #4
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

yes why not test games or compression software or rendering performance ?

ow wait... you did
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 13:56   #5
[M] Reviewer
 
leeghoofd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,159
leeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registered
Default

First up Cesariuth I don't have resources to real rendering software, secondly it is not my interest at all and I find it already very time consuming enough. The test suite in it's current state will highlight most of the performance issues or not from a CPU/platform.

Like said in the two conclusions, this CPU can be good with specially designed software. But in most apps, and for sure with older applications it will not be up to the task to handle even the competition in it's own ranks...

Let's hope for AMD Piledriver will get a bigger boost then the expected 20% ... Piledriver will probably be what Bulldozer should have been from the start...
__________________
leeghoofd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 14:57   #6
Member
 
Teemto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Duffel
Posts: 539
Teemto Fully Registered
Default

I seriously doubt it. Optimizations can help but to bridge the gap with Intel (on Sandy Bridge - not even talking about Sandy Bridge-E) they'd have to have made serious design error in the initial design which somehow has crippled performance and which can then be fixed.

But how realistic is that?

But it's not just the performance, the power consumption of this thing is also not up to current standards.

So either they:

Scrap everything and start working on an FX2 with real cores instead of modules. But I doubt they have the funds to do it.

Or

Try to add a GPU to it and make a higher end APU? But that would've only worked if the FX power consumption had been ok.

Or

Stop with trying to make high end CPU's and focus entirely on their current APU products.

Maybe start looking into some ARM products?
__________________
1999 First home made PC: Celeron 500 * Abit BE6 * Diamond Viper v770 32MB *Quantum Fireball KA 18GB ATA-66 * 64MB SDRAM * Philips 107SX 17" * 50x CD-ROM * Win98
Teemto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 15:19   #7
cesariuth
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks leeghoofd for your answer, but I think that BD have more performance in the real test vs SB , or benchmark donít say much of the real performance of this chip...
Benchmark is always benchmark...but this is my opinion I donít know if this is the opinion of all.

I hope that Pelidriver optimize more than 20% or close to this.

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd November 2011, 17:18   #8
[M] Reviewer
 
leeghoofd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,159
leeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registeredleeghoofd Fully Registered
Default

I know a benchmark is a benchmark, but one of the main reasons that the initial article had this follow up was due to the "rigorous" testing by some highly acclaimed websites... How to show a CPU works well : put the GPU on it's knees and see how they all score the same... that's ridiculous in my book... it was clearly in the reviewers guide shown how we should have done it it. But them proposed tests setups just looked to be more chosen to make a mainstream product look great...

Real rendering software doesn't cut my budget mate, I also have got no experience in that department. I know Flanker is doing some tests with BD at ExtremeSystems.org Though as always take everything with a grain of salt... I think you will find him in the AMD section
__________________
leeghoofd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 14:36   #9
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,465
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

It's funny how it's really hard to find these so-called "real-world" applications. No one is using those, but apparently only those hard-to-find apps are the only ones that are showing the "true power" of Bulldozer.

Fyi, you guys might want to read this: http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...rformance.aspx
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd November 2011, 21:03   #10
Member
 
Teemto's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Duffel
Posts: 539
Teemto Fully Registered
Default

Seems there's others which are not afraid to tell the truth

http://www.atomicmpc.com.au/Review/2...sappoints.aspx
__________________
1999 First home made PC: Celeron 500 * Abit BE6 * Diamond Viper v770 32MB *Quantum Fireball KA 18GB ATA-66 * 64MB SDRAM * Philips 107SX 17" * 50x CD-ROM * Win98
Teemto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CPU - updated AMD FX-8150 / FX-8120 @ ocaholic Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 1st November 2011 06:14
AMD OC Record Broken, Still Powered by AMD FX-8150 Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 31st October 2011 08:01
AMD FX-8150 to be found at 213 euros... leeghoofd WebNews 0 17th October 2011 11:45
AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer CPU Review Stefan Mileschin Articles & Howto's 4 14th October 2011 16:11
AMD FX-8150 Review @ OCC Stefan Mileschin WebNews 1 12th October 2011 07:28
AMD's FX-8150 'Bulldozer' processor Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 12th October 2011 07:21
AMD FX-8150 (AM3+) 3.6GHz Bulldozer CPU Review @ TT Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 12th October 2011 07:21
AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer CPU Review @ Neoseeker Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 12th October 2011 07:20
[M]AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer Reviewed leeghoofd WebNews 0 12th October 2011 05:29
Alpha Pal 8150 T Sockel 754 jmke WebNews 0 27th June 2004 00:16

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:41.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO