| ||Thread Tools|
|22nd March 2006, 21:52||#1|
Join Date: May 2002
Physics acceleration: the Next Big Thing™?
However, the GPU does not feed very much data back to the CPU as a result of its physics calculations, which means that nothing that the GPU produces in the way of physics simulation can really affect gameplay. So you couldn't use the GPU to simulate the partial demolition of a structure that's holding some NPCs, because the CPU wouldn't know enough about the results. The simulated demolition would go from the GPU straight to the framebuffer and onto the screen, like so many water or particle effects, but nobody would tell the actual game code running on the CPU where the large chunks of debris (fallen beams, pieces of wall, the inevitable barrels and crates) had fallen and where the new gap in the wall appeared.
In contrast to GPU-based "physics acceleration," the PhysX co-processor actually collaborates with the CPU to affect gameplay.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Latest AMD game physics push brings soft-body simulations||jmke||WebNews||0||9th March 2010 10:58|
|NVIDIA Big Bang II nothing more than Driver Update||jmke||WebNews||1||26th July 2008 05:38|
|Photoshop to get GPU and physics acceleration||jmke||WebNews||8||26th May 2008 09:28|
|AMD Asymmetric Physics Processing Requirements Revealed||jmke||WebNews||0||9th January 2007 19:47|
|Thermaltake Big Typhoon VX CPU Cooler||jmke||WebNews||0||29th October 2006 18:09|
|Effects Physics & Gameplay Physics Explored||jmke||WebNews||1||11th July 2006 11:00|
|ATI and Physics Acceleration||Sidney||WebNews||0||8th June 2006 00:52|
|ATI On Physics Acceleration||jmke||WebNews||0||23rd March 2006 14:54|
|Futuremark’s Benchmarks to Take Advantage of Physics Processor||jmke||WebNews||0||12th October 2005 16:18|
|Age of physics processing units dawns||Sidney||WebNews||0||8th March 2005 02:44|