![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #11 |
| Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: UK
Posts: 502
![]() | that is what i suspect too, as DDR2 cannot give better performnce than DDR2 at those high latencies. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: UK
Posts: 502
![]() | I meant better performance than DDR (Why can't I edit my own posts?) |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,554
![]() | actually, bandwidth wise DDR2 >> DDR and you can't edit your post in this section of the forum (so people can't alter their statements)
__________________ "Welcome to the internet; where men are men, women are men, and little girls are FBI agents." |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Member Join Date: May 2005 Location: UK
Posts: 502
![]() | I know about the bandwidth but the end result (performance) is not that different, meaning it doesn't justify buying them. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,554
![]() | well not if you want to upgrade to a beefier cpu and you still have some (recently purchased) ddr lying around but if you're buying an all new system, i don't see what the problem is... prices on ddr2 are very competitive nowadays if you ask me...
__________________ "Welcome to the internet; where men are men, women are men, and little girls are FBI agents." |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |