It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
IntelBurnTest v1.5.1 released - Linpack Based Intel CPU Load Test Program IntelBurnTest v1.5.1 released - Linpack Based Intel CPU Load Test Program
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

IntelBurnTest v1.5.1 released - Linpack Based Intel CPU Load Test Program
Thread Tools
Old 27th August 2008, 18:27   #1
jmke's Avatar
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default IntelBurnTest v1.5.1 released - Linpack Based Intel CPU Load Test Program

Linpack by Intel(R) is an extremely stressful program that will put even the most powerful X86/X64 CPU in the world at its knees. Load temp under Linpack will be up to 22C higher than the competing software Prime95. This program will make usage of Linpack easier and more practical.

Keep in mind, use this program at your own risk. By using this program, you agree that neither I nor Intel shall be responsible for including, but not limited to: burned up CPU, fried motherboard, spontaneous room temperature increase, hair loss, or mental stress.

Benefits of using Linpack:
1. More accurate than Prime95 Small FFTs/Blend.
2. Takes less time to tell if your CPU/RAM is unstable than Prime95 (usually
something like 8 minutes Linpack vs 40 hours under Prime95).
3. Use the same stress-testing engine that Intel uses to test their products
before they are packed and put on shelves for sale.
Benefits of using IntelBurnTest:
1. Simplifies usage of Linpack.
2. Direct output of results to the screen.
3. Simplifies the process of selecting a test size to use.
4. Better appearance.
How to test CPU and RAM stability (summarized):
1. It is best to use a 64-bit OS with the 64-bit mode for the most accurate
test result.
2. Use the most available RAM possible (IntelBurnTest can now do this on
its own automatically). The more memory it uses, the more accurate.
3. Select the run # (should use at least 5).
4. Start running. Output should look something like this (unless if error detection is on*):
Size LDA Align. Time(s) GFlops Residual Residual(norm)
10000 10000 4 15.979 41.7337 1.012665e-010 3.570760e-002
10000 10000 4 15.119 44.1087 1.012665e-010 3.570760e-002
10000 10000 4 15.216 43.8254 1.012665e-010 3.570760e-002
NOTE: Depending on the memory size selected, the testing size will be
different, so the Residual(norm) values will not be the same if you
ran this test each time with different amounts of memory selected.
5. Above indicates that the test ran fine so far without instability, but
below indicates instability (the Residual(norm) values aren't the same
throughout running the test):
Size LDA Align. Time(s) GFlops Residual Residual(norm)
10000 10000 4 15.245 43.7434 1.525878e-005 5.380399e+003
10000 10000 4 15.250 43.7303 2.460366e-010 8.675501e-002
10000 10000 4 15.162 43.9816 1.012665e-010 3.570760e-002
NOTE: Instability doesn't necessarily have to happen at the beginning, it
can happen in the middle, or at the end. It could be just ONE of
them that is inconsistent, but that DOES indicate instability. It is
highly recommended to use the most free memory possible for the most
accurate, and quick test. BSOD or freezing are signs of instability
as well.
* If error detection is on, the program will only output the results at the end of the
run, and give a conclusion about whether or not your PC is stable. If it is off,
you will see similar output as above during the testing.
Download link:

Native 64-bit version for WinPE

more info screenshot @

Last edited by jmke : 30th August 2008 at 16:58.
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel K series relieve CPU multiplier limitation-Core i7-875K OC performance Review windwithme Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding 5 12th August 2010 19:18
Intel Core i7 980X Extreme Edition CPU jmke WebNews 0 10th May 2010 14:58
Intel Gulftown 32nm 6-core CPU could work on X58 Motherboards jmke WebNews 0 6th March 2009 17:15
Intel Plans 10W Nehalem CPU jmke WebNews 0 5th February 2009 16:17
Big step to the future, GIGABYTE EX58 EXTREME with Intel I7 EXTREME 965 CPU windwithme General Madness - System Building Advice 11 14th November 2008 05:30
GIGABYTE GA-5BXWV-RH Announced based on Intel X38 jmke WebNews 0 21st August 2007 14:45
Intel prepares boxed quad-core "Penryn" based Xeon processors for November 11 jmke WebNews 0 14th August 2007 23:24
Intel to move to common CPU architecture Sidney WebNews 5 23rd August 2005 20:27
Final Update! - Dual Core Stress Test: AMD vs. Intel Sidney WebNews 1 27th June 2005 07:55
Intel Achieves Major Milestones in EUV Lithography Program Sidney WebNews 8 5th August 2004 03:19

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:17.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO