It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Exploring the performance impact of memory latency Exploring the performance impact of memory latency
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Exploring the performance impact of memory latency
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 1st November 2005, 16:30   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,995
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Exploring the performance impact of memory latency

THESE DAYS, SEEMINGLY every major memory module manufacturer is producing fancy low-latency DIMMs. These DIMMs are equipped with tricked-out heat spreaders and come in a variety of different colors, making them easy to pick out in a crowd. There's more to them than funky cosmetics, though. The most exotic low-latency DIMMs are rated to run at extremely tight 2-2-2-5 timings at 400MHz. Unfortunately, you'll pay a small fortune for the privilege. Low-latency modules cost close to twice as much as more pedestrian DIMMs, if not more.

Lower latencies are a good thing, of course, but how much can they really improve system performance? Are exotic, low-latency DIMMs worth the price premium? Read on as we explore the effects of memory latency on Athlon 64 performance in synthetic memory benchmarks, games, and real-world applications.

http://techreport.com/etc/2005q4/mem...y/index.x?pg=1

Where [M] leads, the rest follows
http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=325
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2005, 16:32   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,995
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

At the end of the day, the appeal of low-latency memory modules may be limited to overclockers and enthusiasts intent on squeezing every last drop of performance from a system. More pedestrian "value" memory should be plenty fast enough for everyone else, especially since you can practically afford twice as much
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2005, 16:44   #3
Member
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

There are two kinds of overclockers; the originals are cheap sh_t, second by those well to do with $$$.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i7 Memory Performance jmke WebNews 0 26th January 2009 17:14
DDR2/DDR3 Combo MB–MSI P45-8D Memory Lover Performance Test windwithme Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding 3 16th January 2009 16:37
Intel Atom 2GB Memory Performance (Linux) jmke WebNews 0 12th January 2009 10:17
PNY D22GX93XLP-5 XLR8 Performance Edition 2GB PC2-9384 Memory jmke WebNews 0 15th June 2007 05:39
Intel P35 Memory Performance: A Closer Look jmke WebNews 0 18th May 2007 19:49
Patriot Memory Extreme Performance 2GB DDR500 DC Kit jmke WebNews 4 12th January 2007 10:40
Intel Quad-Core Memory Performance jmke WebNews 0 17th December 2006 16:44
Super Talent DDR2 PC2-6400 Low Latency Dual Channel Memory jmke WebNews 1 17th March 2006 00:48
Performance Impact on Changing Memory Size from 1GByte to 2 GByte Sidney WebNews 4 30th August 2005 20:45
Rambus’ New Tech Increases Memory Performance by Up to 4 Times jmke WebNews 0 5th April 2005 10:11

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:22.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO