| ||Thread Tools|
|17th November 2008, 15:50||#1|
Join Date: May 2002
Call of Duty: World at War performance in-depth
Considering the high expectations built around Call of Duty: World at War it will be interesting to see how the game stacks up against other competing shooters, but perhaps most importantly how it compares or improves upon last year's Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare which was an all-around success on the PC platform.
'World at War' was built using an enhanced version of the CoD 4 engine which should come as great news for PC gamers. Not only do we expect this game to look really good because of that, but it should also fair quite well on systems with modest specifications. Unlike Crysis and a few other visually stunning games, Call of Duty 4 wasn't able to bring a high-end system to its knees, and believe us that was a good thing.
Call of Duty: World at War certainly shapes up to be one of the most exciting installments on the series yet, and now we must find out how it will run on your computer...
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Graphics Performance||jmke||WebNews||0||11th November 2009 14:49|
|CoD: World at War Gameplay Performance and IQ||jmke||WebNews||0||12th January 2009 19:44|
|Call of Duty 5 World at War: Graphics cards benchmark review||jmke||WebNews||0||13th November 2008 16:15|
|Call of Duty: World at War Benchmarks||jmke||WebNews||0||29th October 2008 13:06|
|Call of Duty 6 Planned for 2009||jmke||WebNews||0||8th August 2008 15:59|
|Call of Duty 2: 512MB matters updated||Sidney||WebNews||1||29th September 2005 17:02|