It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
AMD Socket-F Opteron vs. Intel Woodcrest AMD Socket-F Opteron vs. Intel Woodcrest
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


AMD Socket-F Opteron vs. Intel Woodcrest
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 18th December 2006, 08:46   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,752
jmke has disabled reputation
Default AMD Socket-F Opteron vs. Intel Woodcrest

We first started contacting AMD for a Socket-F platform a few weeks before its release date. Typically, when we receive a platform from AMD, it consists of a couple of CPUs, a main board and some memory. This time around AMD decided to send full platforms from a vendor called Colfax (one of AMD's solutions partners). Note that we used the plural of platform: AMD made a fairly bold move and sent a Woodcrest system as well. Both of the systems were configured identically: same case, power supply, hard drives, DVD-ROM and cooling (minus the CPU fans).

Of course any loyal Intel fan is going to cry foul, but rest assured we checked to see that there was no foul play here. The BIOS settings were configured as identically as possible, the fans were all running inside the case, etc. We've wanted to do this kind of comparison for awhile but lacked the equipment in the lab to create two identical systems. As we alluded to above, the only component that wasn't the same was the processor cooling. Intel's thermal design for most Xeon systems is an air duct that is fed by a hefty 6" fan on one side and vented out the rear of the case (see pictures on the next page). This usually produces a system that sounds like a miniature wind tunnel, at least for the server versions. There are of course a few other differences, but most of those relate to the platform: registered DDR2 vs. FB-DIMMs, different chipsets, and different motherboards were used, but that will always be the case.

http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=2892
__________________
jmke is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Server roundup: Intel "Nehalem" Xeon versus AMD "Shanghai" Opteron jmke WebNews 0 4th May 2009 17:52
AMD Announces Widespread Availability and Broad Global OEM Support for New Quad-Core jmke WebNews 0 13th November 2008 17:17
Intel "Harpertown" Xeon vs. AMD "Barcelona" Opteron Sidney WebNews 0 19th September 2007 00:13
Intel Socket B vs AMD Socket AM3 jmke WebNews 3 14th November 2006 10:23
Intel Woodcrest, AMD Opteron and Sun UltraSparc T1 - Server CPU Shoot-out jmke WebNews 1 9th June 2006 12:16
AMD Puts Pressure On Intel In PC Gaming With New Socket For Two Dual-Core Processors jmke WebNews 11 2nd June 2006 16:36
Intel "Conroe" July 23, AMD Socket F July 11 jmke WebNews 0 26th May 2006 00:50
Workstation Processors Duel: AMD Opteron against Intel Xeon Sidney WebNews 0 22nd December 2005 08:03
AMD Denies Phase Out of Opteron Chips for Socket 939 jmke WebNews 1 14th December 2005 17:42
AMD Cranks Up Speed of Low Power AMD Opteron Chips jmke WebNews 0 23rd March 2005 12:29

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:19.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO