| ||Thread Tools|
|14th December 2005, 16:32||#1|
Join Date: May 2002
AMD Denies Phase Out of Opteron Chips for Socket 939
Advanced Micro Devices denied on Tuesday rumours spread by a web-site regarding cancellation of production of AMD Opteron processors for servers and workstation designed for desktop-oriented 939-pin infrastructure. The company said it would continue to ship the chips for uni-processor (UP) business machines for more than a year from the time speaking.
“Socket 939 AMD Opteron 100 Series processors are in production. AMD will continue to produce Opteron 100 Series processors with ECC unbuffered memory support in 2006, and we will adjust production volumes as needed to supply our server and workstation customers,” said Brett Jacobs, a spokesman for AMD.
A news-story over a web-site claimed that AMD planned to stop manufacturing of AMD Opteron processors in Socket 939 flavour for UP servers and workstations.
AMD Opteron processors for Socket 940 infrastructure require registered memory modules to be installed. While registered memory modules are more reliable in environments where a lot of modules are installed, they also cost more. Given that uni-processor machines are not equipped with a lot of memory typically, increased costs of registered memory were unjustified for a lot of cases. Newer AMD Opteron chips 100-series for uni-processor servers use Socket 939 infrastructure and may use typical unbuffered memory with ECC, which is more affordable compared to registered RAM.
While there were not a lot of mainboards with Socket 939 that actually supported appropriate Opteron processors and, in case of dual-core chips, such support was crucial, a lot of enthusiasts acquired those processors as they were relatively affordable, contained large caches and were suitable for overclocking, a practice to make chips work at higher clock-speed in order to get higher performance while risking with lifetime of the chip.
|14th December 2005, 16:42||#2|
Well, just because they don't officially support it doesn't mean they don't work =P
they just need t get their asses moving and send the Opteron 170 my way ><
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|AMD: We Will Not Cut-Down Feature-Set of Opteron “Magny-Cours” Chips||jmke||WebNews||0||24th February 2010 15:30|
|AMD Announces Widespread Availability and Broad Global OEM Support for New Quad-Core||jmke||WebNews||0||13th November 2008 16:17|
|AMD Denies Cancellation of New-Generation Dual-Core Chips||jmke||WebNews||0||16th June 2008 11:22|
|AMD GAME! Enables Console-like Simplicity for Mainstream PCs||jmke||WebNews||9||19th May 2008 20:51|
|AMD Introduces ‘AMD Business Class’, Designed With Business in Mind||jmke||WebNews||0||28th April 2008 09:33|
|AMD to Phase Out Socket 939 Chips by Year End||jmke||WebNews||0||18th October 2006 07:35|
|AMD Introduces Three New Dual-Core AMD Opteron™ Processors||jmke||WebNews||0||12th March 2006 19:25|
|AMD Set to Launch New Chips After April ’06||jmke||WebNews||0||14th December 2005 16:29|
|AMD Cranks Up Performance of Dual-Core Chips: New Opterons||jmke||WebNews||0||28th September 2005 21:08|
|AMD Cranks Up Speed of Low Power AMD Opteron Chips||jmke||WebNews||0||23rd March 2005 11:29|