AMD's 65nm GPU: why the future of GPUs is smaller, faster, cooler

jmke · 12th April 2007, 18:37

In spite of the fact that it's one of the most complex and cutting-edge integrated circuits in any PC or laptop, the GPU always lags the microprocessor by a few generations in terms of process technology. For instance the current king of GPU performance, NVIDIA's G8800, is made on TSMC's venerable 90nm process, a process node that Intel first introduced way back in early 2004 with the Prescott version of the Pentium 4.

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...er-cooler.html

Kougar · 13th April 2007, 02:29

Hm, I do recall at least some sites claiming G80 was a 80nm part, but Anandtech does say it is 90nm as well. Argh

The amount of G80 GTX cards out there seems to have dried up at least a little from a quick glance around... do you think The G80 Ultra will be 80nm based, possibly a replacement if the infamous MSRP is wrong? That would make sense and seem to fit the facts anyway...

12th April 2007, 18:37	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 82,473	AMD's 65nm GPU: why the future of GPUs is smaller, faster, cooler In spite of the fact that it's one of the most complex and cutting-edge integrated circuits in any PC or laptop, the GPU always lags the microprocessor by a few generations in terms of process technology. For instance the current king of GPU performance, NVIDIA's G8800, is made on TSMC's venerable 90nm process, a process node that Intel first introduced way back in early 2004 with the Prescott version of the Pentium 4. http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...er-cooler.html __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
GELID Solutions ICY VISION GPU Cooler Review	jmke	WebNews	0	1st July 2010 12:04
Cooler Master Hydra 8800 Hybrid GPU Cooler Review	Sidney	WebNews	0	6th December 2007 17:46
Xbox 360 "Jasper" With 65nm GPU Not Due Until August 2008	jmke	Portable Storage, Games, Consoles, Laptops, Phones, Multimedia and Gadget News	0	12th October 2007 14:19
DG: AMD's 65nm Brisbane-Core: Smaller Die. Less Power. Lower Performance?	Mr Robot	Portable Storage, Games, Consoles, Laptops, Phones, Multimedia and Gadget News	0	2nd February 2007 19:01
A quick look at AMD's 65nm Athlon 64 X2 processors	jmke	WebNews	0	20th December 2006 12:18
AMD's 65nm Brisbane Core Previewed: The most energy efficient AMD CPU to date	jmke	WebNews	0	18th December 2006 08:45
HIS delivers faster, quieter and cooler X1650Pro 512/256MB DDR2 AGP Video Card	jmke	WebNews	0	4th October 2006 10:48
Jetart VC3600 VCool GPU Cooler	jmke	WebNews	0	26th May 2006 00:30
Albatron's GeForce 7300 GS - Faster, smaller and CHEAPER	jmke	WebNews	0	27th January 2006 10:34
Arctic Cooling NV Silencer 5 GPU Cooler	Sidney	WebNews	0	6th November 2004 03:47

13th April 2007, 02:29	#2
Kougar Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,640	Hm, I do recall at least some sites claiming G80 was a 80nm part, but Anandtech does say it is 90nm as well. Argh The amount of G80 GTX cards out there seems to have dried up at least a little from a quick glance around... do you think The G80 Ultra will be 80nm based, possibly a replacement if the infamous MSRP is wrong? That would make sense and seem to fit the facts anyway...