![]() |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #11 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,543
![]() | So, given that CPU scores probably will make a bigger difference, will 2K6 replace 2K1 as reference point? |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,497
![]() | 3DMark06 adds more GFX stressing benchmarks; so I'd say CPU is still as important as in 3DMark05... which reflect real games quite correctly actually. but 06 is more system relative than 05 Quote:
and more CPU related info here: http://techgage.com/review.php?id=4007&page=5
__________________ ![]() | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 16,730
![]() |
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Apenland
Posts: 2,069
![]() | pfff, downloaded it, but the 3DMark06.dat file (whooping 1,2Gb btw) is corrupted , and since were at 75% of our download limit, I prolly won't download it anymore this month Aah, well yeah, not that bad, slideshow prolly makes me depressive because my v-cards sucks ![]() |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,267
![]() | Does it work on Win 2k or is there a workaround? |
| | |
| | #16 |
| [M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,513
![]() | http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=34015 6282 with SLI enabled. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,267
![]() | hmmm, 06 seems to love Nvidia |
| | |