| Thread Tools |
18th January 2006, 19:25 | #11 |
Member Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,543
| So, given that CPU scores probably will make a bigger difference, will 2K6 replace 2K1 as reference point? |
18th January 2006, 19:30 | #12 | |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| 3DMark06 adds more GFX stressing benchmarks; so I'd say CPU is still as important as in 3DMark05... which reflect real games quite correctly actually. but 06 is more system relative than 05 Quote:
and more CPU related info here: http://techgage.com/review.php?id=4007&page=5
__________________ | |
19th January 2006, 03:26 | #13 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
|
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
19th January 2006, 06:42 | #14 |
Posts: n/a
| pfff, downloaded it, but the 3DMark06.dat file (whooping 1,2Gb btw) is corrupted , and since were at 75% of our download limit, I prolly won't download it anymore this month Aah, well yeah, not that bad, slideshow prolly makes me depressive because my v-cards sucks |
19th January 2006, 16:57 | #15 |
Posts: n/a
| Does it work on Win 2k or is there a workaround? |
20th January 2006, 13:34 | #16 |
[M] Reviewer Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,587
| http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=34015 6282 with SLI enabled. |
20th January 2006, 15:23 | #17 |
Posts: n/a
| hmmm, 06 seems to love Nvidia |