Futuremarks testsThese synthetic 3D benchmarks from Futuremark allow you to evaluate the expected performance of a system with different generations of games. As each 3DMark uses different features and quality settings, it allows you to get an idea of how your system will perform.
3DMark013Dmark01 has - more than ever - become a system benchmark, as every part is stressed in another test. A good start when we want to see the performance difference between the X38 and P35 chipset. As we kind of expected, very little difference between both DFI motherboards.
3DMark03Same story when we run 3DMark03: both X38 and P35 perform almost the same.
3DMark05In 3DMark05, it seems that the X38 has a slightly better optimized 3D performance, which would not be that strange as the difference between the P35 and X38 chipset lies in the PCIe lanes design.
3DMark06Motherboards play a very small role in the 3DMark06 story, especially as we're using an 8600GT video card, which is not known as the top dog of the video card market. However, we can see that at higher memory speeds, the X38 is slightly faster.
Futuremark’s 3DMark06 has a separate CPU benchmark which runs one of the 3D scenes completely in software, multiple cores will speed up this benchmark, and higher speed memory and faster motherboards will benefit here, although the difference is hardly noticeable.
- Enhance Data transmitting: FAST
- Enhance Addressing: FAST
- T2 Dispatch: Enabled
Clock Setting Fine Delay
Ch1 Clock Crossing Setting: More Aggressive
- DIMM 1 Clock fine delay: Current
- DIMM 2 Clock fine delay: Curren
- DIMM 1 Control fine delay: Current
- DIMM 2 Control fine delay: Current
- Ch 1 Command fine delay: Current
Ch2 Clock Crossing Setting: More Aggressive
- DIMM 3 Clock fine delay: Current
- DIMM 4 Clock fine delay: Current
- DIMM 3 Control fine delay: Current
- DIMM 4 Control fine delay: Current
- Ch 2 Command fine delay: Current
Ch1Ch2 CommonClock Setting: More Aggressive