4-Way Intel P35 Motherboard Overclocking Roundup

Motherboards/Intel S775 by massman @ 2007-11-26

In this group test we compare the overclocking capabilities and performance of 4 motherboards based on the mid-range P35 Intel chipset. From the low cost Asus P5K, affordable Foxconn P35AP-S and MSI Platinum Combo to the expensive DFI P35 Lanparty, which one will come out on top? Find out in this article.

  • prev
  • next

Foxconn P35AP-S: Bios explored

Foxconn P35AP-S: BIOS

Continuing the impression of the Foxconn P35AP-S, we will have a look at the bios next.

Madshrimps (c)


Pretty much the same bios DFI uses. Let's skip - once again - the basic stuff and move on to the PC Health page.

Madshrimps (c)


Very complete, no remarks at all.

Foxconn's answer to the Genie Bios provided by DFI is the Gladiator bios. We hope that the enthusiast experience and knowledge of Shamino will have a positive effect on the further development of the bios features.

Madshrimps (c)


Let's start with the memory timings page.

Madshrimps (c)


Not bad ... but if Foxconn wants to be big on the enthusiast market, they must provide even more settings.

While I was checking out the Gladiator bios, something caught my eye:

Madshrimps (c)


999FSB (theoretical)?!

Next up: the memory dividers.

Madshrimps (c)


Rather difficult notation of the dividers, that could be simplified, but luckily the bios calculates the memory speed on the fly.

How are the voltage options?

Madshrimps (c)

Madshrimps (c)


Pretty much what we need as the vcore can be increased to 2v using a different cpu voltage multiplier (not in the picture).
  • prev
  • next
Comment from Rutar @ 2007/11/26
the madshrimps roundup attack on motherboard reviews, I'd be affraid if I was still writing the outdated one motherboard reviews


Foxconn really works on their street cred with that board
Comment from geoffrey @ 2007/11/26
Owning a P5K myself, good performance considering its price, and not too overloaded with BIOS features which hardly make a difference and are too complicated to understand for people who just jumped in.

Liked the article btw
Comment from Sidney @ 2007/11/26
Can't beat the Asus P5K board in both price and performance.
Comment from Massman @ 2007/11/27
You can by overclocking
Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/27
if you overclock,how will you beat the price/performance value? since FSB OCing hardly has any effect in real world applications
Comment from Rutar @ 2007/11/27
I think it would be more noticable with a Quadcore, where the Vdrop is more important.
Comment from Massman @ 2007/11/27
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
if you overclock,how will you beat the price/performance value? since FSB OCing hardly has any effect in real world applications
You and me have different definitions of overclocking . I see it as benching, you as cost-effective performance tweaking. In other words, I am willing to pay 45€ extra for a board which is faster, you're not.
Comment from thorgal @ 2007/11/28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Massman View Post
You and me have different definitions of overclocking . I see it as benching, you as cost-effective performance tweaking. In other words, I am willing to pay 45€ extra for a board which is faster, you're not.
I can second that, so am I But the majority of people are not, unfortunately for the hardware vendors
Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/28
but Massman, as a reviewer you'll have to look at both sides of the overclocking approach
Comment from Massman @ 2007/11/28
That's why the Price/Perfomance winner =/= High-end winner
Comment from jmke @ 2007/11/29
nope
Comment from Kougar @ 2007/12/02
45nm support on 975X chipsets is iffy, best to check on a individual board by board basis. Some sites have run 45nm chips on 975X ASUS boards however.

Interesting review! Am I correct that the ASUS P5k only has 3 vRegs? That's pitiful, no wonder there are reports that Quadcores would kill the thing. Does explain the 0.1v vdroop problem too, my own 3vReg DS3 had about that same vdroop also with a E6300. To bad Gigabyte didn't show up to the party.

 

reply