It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > Articles & Howto's
Aircooling @ the MAX, Performance & Silence Tested Aircooling @ the MAX, Performance & Silence Tested
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Aircooling @ the MAX, Performance & Silence Tested
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 2nd June 2003, 17:38   #41
BDke
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by veder
ok, i'm going to buy a new cooler. Now i have a zalman with a amd xp 2000+ (palomino ). I had to lower my Vcore (now 1.675) because of the temps (now - normal use with folding- cpu: 58°).

i don't know which HS to buy. I doubt between a slk800 or slk900. Is the difference big between a slk800 and an slk900u (with zalman fan deliverd with my old cooler - CNPS6000CU )
if you have the amd xp 2000+ i suggest you buy the slk900u with a papst 92mm fan.
the best cooling around
(a little more expensive than a slk800 but you will notice the difference)
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2003, 18:20   #42
veder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BDke


if you have the amd xp 2000+ i suggest you buy the slk900u with a papst 92mm fan.
the best cooling around
(a little more expensive than a slk800 but you will notice the difference)
ok boss
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2003, 16:58   #43
BDke
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by veder


ok boss
now you're talking
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2003, 18:31   #44
veder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ok now just convincing my parrents for dze bling bling
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th June 2003, 12:53   #45
veder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ok an slk 900u won't fit on a leadtek nforceČ K7ncr18Dpro. The thingy for your power connector defends it from fitting

going for a slk 800
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2003, 15:26   #46
Devil's Prophet
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When the case stands, the clipped SLK800's fins are aligned horizontally, while the 900 vertically. 900 can be a tad worse than 800 with very good rear-case fans but no double-fanned psu. Hell I'd say, I have both, my clipped SLK800 is doing just fine, also easier to install than the screwesque versions.

But BDke already had much of this info in his post, woops.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2003, 23:05   #47
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So, where do we stand right now in the P4 arena? Who's the king?

Swiftech MCX4000 or SLK800/900U?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2003, 23:33   #48
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,343
TerAngreal Freshly Registered
Default

that's a very good question - unfortunately, we haven't had the chance yet to put them up against each other ourselves ... the MCX4000 is not available in belgium, nor does Swiftech want to send us a sample ...

funny story there; the MCX4000 has been released for months now - nowhere to be found in belgium, but still we got a rather angry mail from one of the chairmen at Swiftech, because we have tested new Thermalright products against an older Swiftech product
TerAngreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2003, 13:40   #49
Pritzl
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I guess I understand where they are coming from because in 3 days of searching the Internet I can only find comparisons between the older MCX462 and the new Thermalrights. Very few reviews have even attempted to compare performance on a P4 platform, let alone match the SLK800/900U up against the MCX4000.

OTOH, that does not explain their contradictory behaviour you mentioned here - I think that Swiftech really needs to put up or shut up and send you guys (and other sites) more samples of the MCX4000 if they want it reviewed, maybe even bundle in SLK800U's if they are confident enough!


Anyway, if you DO review the two head-to-head may I request you do it at two levels?
1. Max performance fitting the highest performance fan like a tornado for absolute comparison.
2. Low noise performance with maybe a vantec stealth 80mm or similar to see how they match up at low CFM.

Thanx
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2003, 13:24   #50
Jinx
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i know this is quite an old thread but i only saw the article now...
but i have a small comment.

The performance of the Alpha PAL might have been a bit off cause normally you would install a shroud onto the heatsink before putting on the fan. I understand you might have left it off to offer better results on the YStech test from the side but realisticly speeking fan placed on the side ... doesn't happen much. at least not without a main fan on the HS
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Direct2D: Hardware Rendering a Browser - Firefox Performance Tested jmke WebNews 0 25th November 2009 11:44
Intel Core i9 2.4ghz, 6-Core Gulftown, Performance and Power Consumption Tested jmke WebNews 1 23rd November 2009 09:32
CPU Virtualization Performance Tested jmke WebNews 0 21st May 2009 11:39
Anno 1404 (Dawn of Discovery) Performance Tested jmke WebNews 0 12th May 2009 09:04
OCZ Gladiator MAX CPU Cooler Tested jmke Articles & Howto's 1 3rd May 2009 21:01
ATI Radeon HD 4890 Overclocked Performance Tested jmke WebNews 0 29th April 2009 07:31
[M] Mushkin Does Liquid Cooling! eXtreme Performance Liquid Tested jmke WebNews 1 31st March 2009 22:49
[M] OCZ Gladiator MAX CPU Cooler Tested jmke WebNews 0 31st March 2009 18:19
ATI Catalyst 8.9 Released, Performance Tested jmke WebNews 0 18th September 2008 00:02
Max Payne 2 Review jmke Articles & Howto's 5 25th February 2004 20:48

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:37.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO