It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
OCZ Z-Series PSU Gets 80 Plus Certification OCZ Z-Series PSU Gets 80 Plus Certification
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


OCZ Z-Series PSU Gets 80 Plus Certification
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 3rd April 2009, 13:57   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default OCZ Z-Series PSU Gets 80 Plus Certification

World of power supplies is quite a confusing one, especially after the debut of "80 Plus" certification. According to the standard's body,80plus.org , 80 Plus is combined between Bronze, Silver and Gold certificates, with gold being over 90% efficient at 50% load and a minimum of 88% efficiency at full load.

During last months' CeBIT show in Han(g)over, Germany - the company stated that their upcoming products will feature 80 Plus Gold certificate for some products. Couple of weeks later, we received news that upcoming 1kW Z-Series received its 80 Plus Gold certificate, claiming that their new power supply will feature 88.23% at 20% load, 90.93% at 50% load and 89.20% at 100% load. Put it layman's terms, this power supply will output 892W at 100% load, or equal amount of juice than some 1100 and 1200W power supplies with lower efficiency ratings.

http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news...y-arrives.aspx
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2009, 22:58   #2
npp
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Layman's terms like those are what confuses people most - they got it completely wrong: the PSU will (hopefuly) output 1000W DC at full load, that's what it's rated for, and those 1000W will be 89,2% of the total amount of energy consumed by the PSU, which is hence 1121W. For comparison, a 1000W PSU with 80% efficiency at full load would consume 1250W, which is 129W more - a huge amount of additional heat.

So that's what some people may be thinking - I'll buy the higher efficiency model, because its real output will be closer to the rated output... lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2009, 00:33   #3
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

NPP you are very correct, they do not know how PSUs function.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2009, 09:28   #4
wutske
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Your indeed right ... I realy don't know what confuses these guys. Every PSU (and not only those in computers) mention the amount of energy it can deliver, the amount of energy it consumes is hardly mentioned. It's the most easy way because you don't need the now the power efficiency to select the right power supply.

//edit: took the time to contact Theo from BSN, hope he'll update the article to prevent more confusion

Last edited by wutske : 5th April 2009 at 09:39.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2009, 12:15   #5
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

yes that's quite a goof by Theo
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2009, 13:56   #6
wutske
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is what he had to say:
Quote:
In terms of power supplies, various manufacturers offer various claims and yield various performance. We do understand power supplies, unfortunately for us - from the good and from the worst side.

While editing this story, I deleted a paragraph that went on to explain our experiences with PSUs, such as a last-months issue with a audio workstation system that pulled less than 450W from the wall socket, yet it was unable to get a stable run with seven different PSUs, including several from the manufacturer in question. Not a single PSU had less than 850W of power and a price of less than 180 EUR.

The machine was consisted out of C2QX6700, 4GB DDR2-800 RAM, nVidia GeForce 9600GSO and four WD Black 500GB drives in RAID5 array. Simple, right? Well, it wasn't.

Our PSU expertise is based on our experience. In the past 10 years, I assembled more than 600 high-end systems ranging from single to quad-socket solutions, up to 128GB of RAM (during my 7-year stint as Testing Manager in VidiLab, we assembled numerous systems... and test something like 110 LCD displays, 80 motherboards, 92 graphics cards, 50 PSUs, 80 CPUs etc etc etc).
I've assembled systems for gaming, CAD/CAM, Hackintoshes and many more. But overall, we do have several thousand systems experience from the people involved in the project [we work with unnamed industry experts form the world of system building, who are giving us feedback] - so, I do think that we have a in-depth knowledge about PSUs, especially in the long run.

But just like you should never load a hard drive below 15% free space, there is unfortunately, no way that you can get stable long-run operation with a 1000W power draw. You're free to call us conservative, but when a 700W-pulling system works for two years with two OCZ PP&C CrossFire 750W PSUs, we call that a success. When a 720W power drawing system causes OCZ's PP&C 860 ESA PSU to go kaboom, then we do not call it a success.

PSUs from various manufacturers, including the manufacturer and the brand mentioned here, we will not put a conclusion on capabilities of a device from a press release, that coming from Airbus SAS, Ferrari, Virgin Galactic or Intel, AMD, and ultimately, the company in question.

What we believe in is that we see. When this PSU comes to our lab and performs stable under 1kW load, we'll say - nice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2009, 15:33   #7
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

nice story; but doesn't make his claim through
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th April 2009, 17:20   #8
wutske
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Same idea. I just had a 3 years cours of electronics behind my back, the theory is still fresh in my head and power ratings never include the power efficiency.
Peak power sometimes is used for commercial purposes, but this values doesn't include efficiency either.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2009, 06:09   #9
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
You're free to call us conservative, but when a 700W-pulling system works for two years with two OCZ PP&C CrossFire 750W PSUs, we call that a success.
This by itself is proof of the opposite. By his reasoning those 750W rated PSUs are rated for 600-640W, and he would be overloading them! The efficiency isn't subtracted from the official wattage rating, it is multiplied by the rating and then subtracted from the power draw from the wall to get actual system power usage.

It also must be taken into consideration when looking at readings from a wall power meter... 750W draw from the wall means the system is drawing 600W to function assuming a flat 80% AC/DC conversion efficiency (which is a huge oversimplification, but for the sake of an example... )

Quote:
The machine was consisted out of C2QX6700, 4GB DDR2-800 RAM, nVidia GeForce 9600GSO and four WD Black 500GB drives in RAID5 array. Simple, right? Well, it wasn't.
I find it unlikely this setup could pull 700 or greater from the wall... the voltages and overclocks required would need to be dangerously high. Considering it required a Q6600, 8800GTS, 4 HDDs in RAID 10, extra HDD, sound card, fan controller, MCP655 pump, ~9 120mm case fans and some extreme CPU/GPU overclocking for me to reach >700W power draw from the wall...

PSUs are rated for a set output. This is not like hard drives where the GB rating is overstated. Some PSU manufacturers still cheat and overstate their PSU rating / capability. If he wants to convince me of this I'd need to hear an electrical engineer from one of these PSU companies confirming this. Just as he claims it goes against his experience, it goes against all the experience I have and what information I have studied regarding power supplies.

Last edited by Kougar : 6th April 2009 at 06:20.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2009, 08:53   #10
wutske
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kougar View Post
This by itself is proof of the opposite. By his reasoning those 750W rated PSUs are rated for 600-640W, and he would be overloading them! The efficiency isn't subtracted from the official wattage rating, it is multiplied by the rating and then subtracted from the power draw from the wall to get actual system power usage.
I think he's trying to say that he had a 700W pulling system powered by two 750W rated power supplies ... Which I think is overkill and also inefficient because both power supplies would only be running at 50% capacity at which most power supplies have a lower efficiency (+the inefficiency is doubled because he has two PSUs instead of one).

Second, if a 400W audio station can't run stable on 850W+ PSUs than I think it's time he either change the motherboard or change the electrical wirings in his house.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enermax launches 80PLUS® Gold certified PSU series Pro87+ and Modu87+ jmke WebNews 0 14th January 2010 10:41
OCZ Z Series 850W PSU Review jmke WebNews 0 28th September 2009 12:46
OCZ 550W Fatal1ty ( OCZ550FTY) Series PSU Review jmke WebNews 0 28th August 2009 09:41
Enermax ECO80+ - Most Silent PSU Series jmke WebNews 0 6th August 2009 13:28
OCZ Technology Introduces the Agility Series 2.5” Solid State Drives jmke WebNews 0 10th June 2009 10:55
OCZ Technology Introduces Summit Series SSDs jmke WebNews 0 20th May 2009 10:10
OCZ Technology Introduces New Apex Series Solid State Drives jmke WebNews 0 14th January 2009 17:05
OCZ Technology Group Introduces New Flex EX Performance Memory Series jmke WebNews 0 17th December 2008 09:31
OCZ Announces PC-5000 Platinum DFI nF4 Special Series jmke WebNews 0 7th April 2005 12:03
OCZ Announces PC3200 Gold Series with 2-2-2 Timings jmke WebNews 0 24th March 2005 09:16

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 18:52.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO