| Thread Tools |
25th May 2005, 12:10 | #11 |
Posts: n/a
| that is what i suspect too, as DDR2 cannot give better performnce than DDR2 at those high latencies. |
25th May 2005, 12:11 | #12 |
Posts: n/a
| I meant better performance than DDR (Why can't I edit my own posts?) |
25th May 2005, 13:27 | #13 |
Posts: n/a
| actually, bandwidth wise DDR2 >> DDR and you can't edit your post in this section of the forum (so people can't alter their statements) |
26th May 2005, 06:47 | #14 |
Posts: n/a
| I know about the bandwidth but the end result (performance) is not that different, meaning it doesn't justify buying them. |
26th May 2005, 16:59 | #15 |
Posts: n/a
| well not if you want to upgrade to a beefier cpu and you still have some (recently purchased) ddr lying around but if you're buying an all new system, i don't see what the problem is... prices on ddr2 are very competitive nowadays if you ask me... |
Thread Tools | |
| |