It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Dimensity 9000 fails to prove its premium chipset Dimensity 9000 fails to prove its premium chipset
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Dimensity 9000 fails to prove its premium chipset
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st December 2021, 14:41   #1
[M] Reviewer
 
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 149,093
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Dimensity 9000 fails to prove its premium chipset

Lacks in GPU, 5G, imaging, features

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 got a lot of coverage, and the marketing machine is trying to promote this chipset as a premium. Guess what? Dimensity 9000 is not a premium chipset as it suffers from stitched stock Cortex IP, stock Mali GPU, lack of premium phone design wins, and, most importantly, too optimistic SoC clocks. The clocks, especially the mid-cluster, might get the company in trouble due to the high energy drain.

Let me walk through the MediaTek mindset and how things work. There is a big culture of overpromising and under-delivering that we’ve seen in the past. Let’s quickly brush up your memory with Helio cores that at one point introduced three clusters of SoC that failed to materialize in performance in the real world.

The worst part is a significant inconsistency problem with the designs. The company is known for changing its branding (Helio vs. Dimensity now), roadmap, market segment, and other inconsistencies.

In the past, Mediatek made some significant market gains in the mid and especially low-end market with its 4G solutions. That is where they stayed for most of the 4G decade, especially with design wins in China, but they never ended up being called a Premium chipset manufacturer.

First, let’s address the big elephant in the room, the Sports mode specific to benchmarking from 2020 discovered by our friends at Anandtech. MediaTek was known to boost the clock at the expense of battery life, creating winning performance scores and essentially delisting from some prominent platforms, including 3Dmark and PCMark. Wikipedia calls it Benchmark cheating. I would be curious to see if they are still whitelisting to boost their benchmark scores with D9000 as they never came out publicly and are committed to changing their ways.

https://fudzilla.com/news/mobile/540...remium-chipset
Stefan Mileschin is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MediaTek Announces Dimensity 9000: Supercharged Flagship SoC on 4nm Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 19th November 2021 11:30
Poco M4 Pro 5G comes with Dimensity 810 SoC Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 10th November 2021 09:00
Realme could be first to use Mediatek 6nm Dimensity 810 SoC Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 13th August 2021 07:15
OnePlus Announces Nord 2 with Dimensity 1200 SoC Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 23rd July 2021 07:05
AirPods Max Review: Premium Price for a Premium Experience Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 1st March 2021 06:54
MediaTek Announces Dimensity 1000+ SoC Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 8th May 2020 07:57
"Mad" Mike Hughes fails to prove flat earth conspiracy Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 25th February 2020 08:26
CES 2020: MediaTek Announces New Dimensity 800 Mid-Range 5G SoC Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 8th January 2020 10:44
MediaTek Announces Dimensity 1000 SoC: Back To The High-End With 5G Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 26th November 2019 08:31
Thermalright HR-05 Chipset Cooler Tested on Asus ASUS A8N-SLI Premium jmke WebNews 0 6th April 2006 21:59

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO