Point Of View Geforce FX5900XT + Call of Duty

26th February 2004, 15:16

Ik verkoop mijn gloednieuwe Point Of View Geforce FX5900XT

Reden: mijn shuttle voeding trekt geen vidkaaren met een extra molex

Model Name: GeForce FX 5900 XT
Video Memory: 128 MB
Core Clock: 390 Mhz
Memory Clock: 680 Mhz
Memory Access Speed: 2,8 ns
AGP AGP 3.0 (8x / 4x / 2x / 1x) Fast Writes
RAMDAC Dual: 400 Mhz
D-Sub: Yes
DVI-I: Yes
TV-Out: Yes

De kaart is een week oud en heeft dus nog de volledige garantie (faktuur krijg je uiteraard erbij).
Bijgeleverd was ook het spel Call Of Duty (met geldige ongebruikte cd key)
Alle meegeleverde kabels, drivers en software zit erbij.

Vergelijkende review van de FX5900XT tegen de rest:
http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/112/
Conclusie:What a nice card to own people! We see a decent enough potential in overclocking on this card that brings it close towards GeForce FX 5900 Ultra in some cases. In fact it closes in on the default clocked 5950 Ultra so that makes up for a lot, I guess. The product is equipped with memory that can handle a tad more than it's default specification, that's additional value. So it's like this, if you do not want or simply can't spend a huge amount of money on a high-end graphics cards and can settle for a little less, then we definitely recommend the product, it's very stable and for the money it offers heaps of functionality, features and really nice performance. You can basically play any game to date without any issue at all.
What to say about the Aeolus 5900 XT .. three words. Value, value, value. What the GeForce 4 Ti4200 was compared to the GeForce 4 Ti 4600 is this product, pure value versus really good performance.
Two thumbs up and highly recommended.

Reviews van de Point of View versie:
http://www.hartware.net/review_381_7.html (duits)
Conclusie: "Trotz der leisen Kühlung ist diese vergleichsweise effektiv, denn im Test ließ sich die Point of View GeForce FX5900 XT von 390/680 MHz auf satte 471/839 MHz übertakten, ohne dass im Dauerbetrieb Stabilitätsprobleme oder Bildfehler auftraten. Das sind immerhin 21% bzw. 23% mehr als Standard und liegt etwa auf dem Niveau einer FX5900 Ultra (450/850 MHz)." Hartware redaktionstipp

http://www.3dchips-fr.com/articles/a...hp?p=1&IDa=135 (frans)
Conclusie: "Cette GeForce FX 5900XT, est impressionnante à tous points de vue, car elle n'a ete que tres rarement prise en defaut dans nos tests. Sa bande passante memoire l'avantage dans les tests où une GeForce FX 5700 Ultra est à la peine, notamment quand on active l'antialiasing, les amateurs de simulations aeriennes (FS 04) ou d'autres jeux tres gourmands en ressources graphiques (on pense a UT 2003 ou Splinter Cell), apprecieront sa puissance." "La GeForce FX 5900XT est vous l'avez compris l'affaire du moment ! Puissante, overclockable à souhait, et bon marche (moins de 220 € dans certaines boutiques on-line) que demande le peuple ? C'est la remplacante de la regrettee GeForce4 Ti 4200." "Selection Or" de la rédaction de 3Dchips-fr

http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews/XTs/index.htm (engels)
Conclusie: "For the benchmark junkies out there I don't think you can get a better bang for the buck card in 3dMark03 and this really is the TI4200 of its generation"

Info van de fabrikant:
http://www.pointofview-online.com/10.../fx/fx5900.php

Nieuwprijs: 200 euro (bij loveno kost de aopen versie 220)
Vraagprijs: rond 180 euro (als ge CoD niet moet hebben -20 euro)

26th February 2004, 18:10

Je kan altijd je shuttle voeding vervangen. Zijn er van 200 tot 250watt verkrijgbaar voor een 50 à 65 eur

RichBa5tard · 26th February 2004, 18:34

Misschien dat uwe shuttle wel een r9700pro trekt (floppy connector van PSU)? Die verbruiken wat minder dan een 5900XT. Indien zo, wil ik wel ruilen zonder CoD (je kan altijd eerst proberen, ben ook van leuven).

jmke · 26th February 2004, 18:44

R9700Pro is sneller dan een FX5900XT....

RichBa5tard · 26th February 2004, 22:09

Ja, maar ATI linux drivers vallen dik tegen. Beeldkwaliteit van mijn GF2 Pro in linux is beter... maar uiteraard wel 10x trager. : /

jmke · 26th February 2004, 22:12

it's a sad day when someone starts buying hardware to fit his software. instead of just switching sofware (hey look, DUALBOOT)

RichBa5tard · 27th February 2004, 10:30

I'd rather find it more sad to buy software to fit your hardware, than the other way around. : )

If i can get my work faster done on linux, a 10% performance loss (in games) doesn't matter that much too me.

Anyway, I still have an extra disk lying around with WinXP for benchmarking... maybe i should keep the radeon, make my system dualboot and hope for better drivers in the future.

27th February 2004, 11:04

RichBa5tard: aanbod wordt overwogen.
Ik hou u op de hoogte

jmke · 27th February 2004, 11:13

Quote:

Originally posted by RichBa5tard
maybe i should keep the radeon, make my system dualboot and hope for better drivers in the future.

I'd choose this option

27th February 2004, 15:06

ik heb een bod van 145 euro zonder CoD
http://www.tones.be/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12563

26th February 2004, 15:16	#1
HaLDoL Posts: n/a	Point Of View Geforce FX5900XT + Call of Duty Ik verkoop mijn gloednieuwe Point Of View Geforce FX5900XT Reden: mijn shuttle voeding trekt geen vidkaaren met een extra molex Model Name: GeForce FX 5900 XT Video Memory: 128 MB Core Clock: 390 Mhz Memory Clock: 680 Mhz Memory Access Speed: 2,8 ns AGP AGP 3.0 (8x / 4x / 2x / 1x) Fast Writes RAMDAC Dual: 400 Mhz D-Sub: Yes DVI-I: Yes TV-Out: Yes De kaart is een week oud en heeft dus nog de volledige garantie (faktuur krijg je uiteraard erbij). Bijgeleverd was ook het spel Call Of Duty (met geldige ongebruikte cd key) Alle meegeleverde kabels, drivers en software zit erbij. Vergelijkende review van de FX5900XT tegen de rest: http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/112/ Conclusie:What a nice card to own people! We see a decent enough potential in overclocking on this card that brings it close towards GeForce FX 5900 Ultra in some cases. In fact it closes in on the default clocked 5950 Ultra so that makes up for a lot, I guess. The product is equipped with memory that can handle a tad more than it's default specification, that's additional value. So it's like this, if you do not want or simply can't spend a huge amount of money on a high-end graphics cards and can settle for a little less, then we definitely recommend the product, it's very stable and for the money it offers heaps of functionality, features and really nice performance. You can basically play any game to date without any issue at all. What to say about the Aeolus 5900 XT .. three words. Value, value, value. What the GeForce 4 Ti4200 was compared to the GeForce 4 Ti 4600 is this product, pure value versus really good performance. Two thumbs up and highly recommended. Reviews van de Point of View versie: http://www.hartware.net/review_381_7.html (duits) Conclusie: "Trotz der leisen Kühlung ist diese vergleichsweise effektiv, denn im Test ließ sich die Point of View GeForce FX5900 XT von 390/680 MHz auf satte 471/839 MHz übertakten, ohne dass im Dauerbetrieb Stabilitätsprobleme oder Bildfehler auftraten. Das sind immerhin 21% bzw. 23% mehr als Standard und liegt etwa auf dem Niveau einer FX5900 Ultra (450/850 MHz)." Hartware redaktionstipp http://www.3dchips-fr.com/articles/a...hp?p=1&IDa=135 (frans) Conclusie: "Cette GeForce FX 5900XT, est impressionnante à tous points de vue, car elle n'a ete que tres rarement prise en defaut dans nos tests. Sa bande passante memoire l'avantage dans les tests où une GeForce FX 5700 Ultra est à la peine, notamment quand on active l'antialiasing, les amateurs de simulations aeriennes (FS 04) ou d'autres jeux tres gourmands en ressources graphiques (on pense a UT 2003 ou Splinter Cell), apprecieront sa puissance." "La GeForce FX 5900XT est vous l'avez compris l'affaire du moment ! Puissante, overclockable à souhait, et bon marche (moins de 220 € dans certaines boutiques on-line) que demande le peuple ? C'est la remplacante de la regrettee GeForce4 Ti 4200." "Selection Or" de la rédaction de 3Dchips-fr http://www.driverheaven.net/reviews/XTs/index.htm (engels) Conclusie: "For the benchmark junkies out there I don't think you can get a better bang for the buck card in 3dMark03 and this really is the TI4200 of its generation" Info van de fabrikant: http://www.pointofview-online.com/10.../fx/fx5900.php Nieuwprijs: 200 euro (bij loveno kost de aopen versie 220) Vraagprijs: rond 180 euro (als ge CoD niet moet hebben -20 euro)

26th February 2004, 18:34	#3
RichBa5tard [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 3,344	Misschien dat uwe shuttle wel een r9700pro trekt (floppy connector van PSU)? Die verbruiken wat minder dan een 5900XT. Indien zo, wil ik wel ruilen zonder CoD (je kan altijd eerst proberen, ben ook van leuven). __________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini \| Core Duo 1.6Ghz \| 2GB DDR2 \| 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook \| Core 2 2.0Ghz \| 4GB DDR2 \| 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz \| HD3850 OC \| Asrock 4coredual-vsta \| 2GB DDR2

26th February 2004, 18:44	#4
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	R9700Pro is sneller dan een FX5900XT.... __________________

26th February 2004, 22:09	#5
RichBa5tard [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 3,344	Ja, maar ATI linux drivers vallen dik tegen. Beeldkwaliteit van mijn GF2 Pro in linux is beter... maar uiteraard wel 10x trager. : / __________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini \| Core Duo 1.6Ghz \| 2GB DDR2 \| 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook \| Core 2 2.0Ghz \| 4GB DDR2 \| 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz \| HD3850 OC \| Asrock 4coredual-vsta \| 2GB DDR2

26th February 2004, 22:12	#6
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	it's a sad day when someone starts buying hardware to fit his software. instead of just switching sofware (hey look, DUALBOOT) __________________

26th February 2004, 18:10	#2
-Gino- Posts: n/a	Je kan altijd je shuttle voeding vervangen. Zijn er van 200 tot 250watt verkrijgbaar voor een 50 à 65 eur

27th February 2004, 10:30	#7
RichBa5tard [M] Reviewer/HWBot ***** Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 3,344	I'd rather find it more sad to buy software to fit your hardware, than the other way around. : ) If i can get my work faster done on linux, a 10% performance loss (in games) doesn't matter that much too me. Anyway, I still have an extra disk lying around with WinXP for benchmarking... maybe i should keep the radeon, make my system dualboot and hope for better drivers in the future. __________________ HTPC (mac osx): Mac Mini \| Core Duo 1.6Ghz \| 2GB DDR2 \| 26\" TFT Development (mac osx): Macbook \| Core 2 2.0Ghz \| 4GB DDR2 \| 250GB HD Games (win xp): E2160 @ 2.4Ghz \| HD3850 OC \| Asrock 4coredual-vsta \| 2GB DDR2

27th February 2004, 11:04	#8
HaLDoL Posts: n/a	RichBa5tard: aanbod wordt overwogen. Ik hou u op de hoogte

27th February 2004, 15:06	#10
HaLDoL Posts: n/a	ik heb een bod van 145 euro zonder CoD http://www.tones.be/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12563

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Point of View Planning Geforce GTX 460 with GPU OCed to 850Mhz (stock:675MHz)	jmke	WebNews	2	2nd August 2010 13:20
Point of View GeForce 9400 GT 1024 MB Wall-E Edition	jmke	WebNews	2	9th September 2008 15:50
Point of View GeForce 9500 GT Graphics Card	jmke	WebNews	0	30th August 2008 09:24
NVidia considers an across-the-board overhaul of its marketing strategy	Shogun	WebNews	4	9th May 2008 13:08
Point of View GeForce 7900GTX 512MB	jmke	WebNews	0	22nd April 2006 10:11
Point of View GeForce 6600 GT Review	Sidney	WebNews	0	13th May 2005 15:22
Point of view ships Geforce 6800 GT	jmke	WebNews	0	19th June 2004 17:03