 |  |  |  |  |
The TCCD-pire Strikes Back? Athlon 64 S754 Memory Roundup
| |||||||||
|
The TCCD-pire Strikes Back? Athlon 64 S754 Memory Roundup
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
1st December 2004, 00:32
| #1 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,498
 |  The TCCD-pire Strikes Back? Athlon 64 S754 Memory Roundup I did some overtime, but I finally finished this roundup, read on to find out WHY it took me so long  We compared 5 different Samsung TCCD powered memory modules, discovering some surprising performance differences between them. To give these new TCCD chips a worthy competitor we also included results from Winbond BH-6 running with high VDIMM. How do they fair on an A64 S754 platform? Read on to find out http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=258
__________________  |
|  |
|
1st December 2004, 01:19
| #2 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 16,730
 | The most timing consuming article on record?? Excellent work!! You must be feeling better now.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
| |
|
1st December 2004, 12:13
| #3 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: May 2002 Location: wherever the doom is
Posts: 3,174
| so my adata vitesta should be just fine at 2 sticks if the socket 939 does the same thing as socket 754.
__________________ OC-2-the-death Where the Reverend is doing his Magick, all mortals be silent Doom over the world |
|
| |
|
1st December 2004, 12:52
| #4 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,498
| it seems that the S939 A64 on-die memory controller copes much better with dual memory modules installed, which would be logical as it's meant for dual channel 
__________________ |
|
| |
|
1st December 2004, 16:05
| #5 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,514
| let's hope so. great article JMke !
__________________  |
|
| |
|
1st December 2004, 21:55
| #6 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,498
| thank you Gamer, be prepared, 13/12.
__________________ |
|
| |
|
2nd December 2004, 18:49
| #7 |
|
Posts: n/a
| Thanks for the review! I just thought to say that im reaching 310 with 7-3-3-2.5 with a single 512 stick A.data ddr600 with my dfi 250gb.. with 2.8 volts.. prime95 stable for atleast 4 hours... but maybe its my sempron mem controller..? Dunno.. |
| |
|
2nd December 2004, 19:08
| #8 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,498
| it's mostly related to on-die memory controller of the CPU indeed.. but I see you are running at "2T" my tests were done at 1T , which makes a huge difference in memory bandwidth
__________________ |
|
| |
|
2nd December 2004, 19:32
| #9 |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,823
| 2T ain't a good performer on the s754 chipset , dump it. A lower fsb with 1T will be better .
__________________ |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\||____ |....The BEER TRUCK.... ||||'""|""°\_,__ |___Just for You___l||__|__|___|) _____| |(@)(@)""""""""""""**|(@)(@)****|(@)| |
|
| |
|
2nd December 2004, 19:34
| #10 |
| Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 82,498
| 2T is no good performer, period.
__________________ |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
