It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > Articles & Howto's
EK Supreme and Koolance CPU-340 Compared to The Competition EK Supreme and Koolance CPU-340 Compared to The Competition
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


EK Supreme and Koolance CPU-340 Compared to The Competition
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16th April 2008, 17:59   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default EK Supreme and Koolance CPU-340 Compared to The Competition

Today we add two new blocks to our previous roundup, newcomer EK Supreme out of Slovenia and Koolance replacement to their CPU-330 the CPU-340....

http://www.madshrimps.be/gotoartik.php?articID=810
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008, 18:01   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

This review of the EK Supreme also put it in the lead!
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/E...Supreme/5.html
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2008, 19:27   #3
[M] Reviewer
 
thorgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
thorgal Freshly Registered
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
This review of the EK Supreme also put it in the lead!
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/E...Supreme/5.html
A most impressive block indeed, but techpowerup didn't put on very stiff competition (best = TDX block which in our review is only average).

Other than that : great work Keith : you've rounded up what I believe are almost all the best cpu-blocks out there. I would like to see the Alphacool NexXxos highflow in between the others though, I own it myself and I wonder how it performs in comparison.
__________________



thorgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2008, 06:23   #4
eva2000
 
Posts: n/a
Default

thanks for the review!

would be interesting to see how dtek fuzion + 4.5mm nozzle would fair amongst the current results
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2008, 08:05   #5
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,737
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Keith your stock aircooling results are very impressive, below 60C with overclocked Q6600 @ 3Ghz...

we've seen 90C in closed case with stock Intel cooling at those speeds: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=5 96
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2008, 08:33   #6
[M] Reviewer
 
thorgal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
thorgal Freshly Registered
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
Keith your stock aircooling results are very impressive, below 60C with overclocked Q6600 @ 3Ghz...

we've seen 90C in closed case with stock Intel cooling at those speeds: http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=get...&articID=5 96
Yes, at 1,52Volts... A Q6600G0 can run 3Ghz @ stock voltage (or close).
__________________



thorgal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2008, 08:55   #7
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Arctic Freezer 7 Pro + Q6600 G0 @1.20v @ 3.20GHz had Coretemp readings of 55-60c. Ambient roughly 23.3c. I think it speaks volumes about that test rig setup

Nice review, will have to keep my eye on both waterblocks. I wonder what will be out for Nehalem...
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[M] EK Supreme and Koolance CPU-340 Compared to The Competition jmke WebNews 1 16th April 2008 18:00

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO