It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Windows 8: The Legacy-less Windows We've Been Waiting for Windows 8: The Legacy-less Windows We've Been Waiting for
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Windows 8: The Legacy-less Windows We've Been Waiting for
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 6th June 2011, 14:07   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,579
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Windows 8: The Legacy-less Windows We've Been Waiting for

Four years ago, July 2007, Microsoft released the first few tidbits of information about Windows 7. Vista had just been shipped, and it wasn't received well - both by critics and the marketplace. During these days, I argued that for Windows 7, Microsoft ought to scrap the Vista userland, and build an entirely new interface and userland on top of Windows NT, while maintaining a 'classic' Windows version on the side for business and other reluctant folk who want to see the 'new' Windows mature a little bit first. While they didn't do this with Windows 7, they are doing exactly this with Windows 8. Ladies and gentlemen, Windows 8 is the first 'cut the legacy'-release we've all been waiting for - and Microsoft couldn't have picked a better time.

The plan that I proposed for Windows 7 went something like this: maintain the Windows NT kernel and related subsystems, ditch the Vista userland and interface, build a new userland and interface on top, and implement a virtual machine (or something to that effect) for backwards compatibility. At the same time, maintain a 'classic' version of Windows for reluctant users and the business world, who will generally want to wait until the 'new' Windows has become more mature and the applications they need have been ported.

While I proposed this plan for Windows 7, I always ended the several articles on this topic with the disclaimer that while I would like to see this plan implemented for Windows 7, it wasn't very likely. I was right - the time wasn't ripe. Well, it would seem that it is now, as several pieces of the puzzle have fallen into place: MinWin, the new userland and interface, relegate backwards compatibility to a virtual machine or something similar, and maintain a 'classic' version of Windows.

http://www.osnews.com/story/24814/Wi...en_Waiting_for
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 hit Windows Update jmke WebNews 0 23rd February 2011 10:04
Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 Beta Released jmke WebNews 1 13th July 2010 16:54
Announcing Windows Server 2008 R2 and Windows 7 Service Pack 1 jmke WebNews 0 19th March 2010 07:28
Support for Windows 2000, Windows XP SP2 ends July 2010 jmke WebNews 0 9th December 2009 09:08
ATI Catalyst™ 9.5 for Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP, and Linux platforms jmke WebNews 0 20th May 2009 09:09
Mozilla thinks about dropping support for Windows 2000 and Windows XP Pre-SP3 jmke WebNews 0 15th April 2009 12:00
Windows 7 build 7048 vs. Windows 7 beta 1 vs. Vista vs. XP performance shootout jmke WebNews 0 11th March 2009 16:22
Beginners Guides: Downgrading Windows Vista Back To Windows XP Massman WebNews 0 24th September 2008 20:50

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:35.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO