Windows 7 put before Firingsquad: Runs Games Faster than XP ?

jmke · 28th January 2009, 17:13

Right now, Windows 7 is kind of a mixed bag. While it was able to beat both Vista and XP in certain applications, it also got beat in others. 3DMark06 gave a clear advantage to XP on both of our test beds, while Vantage favored Vista by about 10%. However, real world performance brought our numbers to a much narrower margin, with Windows 7 performing admirably in both DX9 and DX10 modes. Crysis still favors Vista pretty heavily as it officially trounced Windows 7 by 16 frames per second on average on our high-end test bed. The margin was closed when we take a look at our mid-range setup, when that gap shrunk to a one frame difference.

In all other applications though, the margin was much smaller as Windows 7 appears poised to be a serious contender as far as performance goes. USB transfer rates saw a decent increase while CPU utilization saw a small decrease, giving some credence to Microsoft’s claim that they have reworked the USB subsystem. Boot times are also worth mentioning not only because Windows 7 was faster, but more importantly, because Windows 7 felt more ready to go once the desktop loaded up. Both XP and Vista took at least an extra minute after the desktop loaded to be ready to run applications, while Windows 7 ran Firefox without stuttering or hesitation. Overall, we would say that Windows 7 was just snappier and more responsive when it came to general usage.

http://firingsquad.com/hardware/wind...ce/default.asp

28th January 2009, 21:30

I have no idea what they did at redmond, but Windows 7 is flying like a bird with bodybuilder's muscles

.
Or maybe it's just psychological ... fast XP, slow Vista, faster 7

28th January 2009, 22:53

In all honesty they messed up the colors on their charts... half the time W7 is blue, other half it is Vista. Annoying, since they do not sort charts from best to worst performing.

I was not sure about the use of a 4870 X2 card to test a brand new, beta OS. It should be amazing that Windows 7 runs a Crossfire setup at all, usually that would be one of the last configurations to be optimzied for in graphics drivers. Sort of a worst case scenario as far as GPU choices go.

29th January 2009, 04:56

its possible thats why they did it?

Crossfire + windows 7 gives us buggy poorly optimised drivers that STILL blaze ahead?

Sounds like good news to me mate

28th January 2009, 17:13	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,013	Windows 7 put before Firingsquad: Runs Games Faster than XP ? Right now, Windows 7 is kind of a mixed bag. While it was able to beat both Vista and XP in certain applications, it also got beat in others. 3DMark06 gave a clear advantage to XP on both of our test beds, while Vantage favored Vista by about 10%. However, real world performance brought our numbers to a much narrower margin, with Windows 7 performing admirably in both DX9 and DX10 modes. Crysis still favors Vista pretty heavily as it officially trounced Windows 7 by 16 frames per second on average on our high-end test bed. The margin was closed when we take a look at our mid-range setup, when that gap shrunk to a one frame difference. In all other applications though, the margin was much smaller as Windows 7 appears poised to be a serious contender as far as performance goes. USB transfer rates saw a decent increase while CPU utilization saw a small decrease, giving some credence to Microsoft’s claim that they have reworked the USB subsystem. Boot times are also worth mentioning not only because Windows 7 was faster, but more importantly, because Windows 7 felt more ready to go once the desktop loaded up. Both XP and Vista took at least an extra minute after the desktop loaded to be ready to run applications, while Windows 7 ran Firefox without stuttering or hesitation. Overall, we would say that Windows 7 was just snappier and more responsive when it came to general usage. http://firingsquad.com/hardware/wind...ce/default.asp __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
175 Windows 7 Tweaks, Tips, and How-To Articles	jmke	WebNews	2	23rd October 2009 14:00
Microsoft Patch Tuesday: 5 Criticals, 2 Important, 1 Moderate Patch	jmke	WebNews	0	14th April 2009 18:47
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for September 2008	jmke	WebNews	0	9th September 2008 19:20
Crysis runs better on Windows XP	jmke	WebNews	1	2nd October 2007 13:45
Microsoft’s New Patch to Improve 3D Games Performance on Windows Vista Systems	jmke	WebNews	0	1st September 2007 15:49
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for August 2007	jmke	WebNews	0	14th August 2007 22:21
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for February 2007	jmke	WebNews	0	14th February 2007 00:25
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for June 2006	jmke	WebNews	0	14th June 2006 20:51
List of fixes included in Windows XP Service Pack 2	jmke	WebNews	1	17th August 2004 15:03

28th January 2009, 21:30	#2
wutske Posts: n/a	I have no idea what they did at redmond, but Windows 7 is flying like a bird with bodybuilder's muscles . Or maybe it's just psychological ... fast XP, slow Vista, faster 7

28th January 2009, 22:53	#3
Kougar Posts: n/a	In all honesty they messed up the colors on their charts... half the time W7 is blue, other half it is Vista. Annoying, since they do not sort charts from best to worst performing. I was not sure about the use of a 4870 X2 card to test a brand new, beta OS. It should be amazing that Windows 7 runs a Crossfire setup at all, usually that would be one of the last configurations to be optimzied for in graphics drivers. Sort of a worst case scenario as far as GPU choices go.

29th January 2009, 04:56	#4
dazzawul Posts: n/a	its possible thats why they did it? Crossfire + windows 7 gives us buggy poorly optimised drivers that STILL blaze ahead? Sounds like good news to me mate