It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Windows 7 On Multicore: Up to 17% More Power Efficient Windows 7 On Multicore: Up to 17% More Power Efficient
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Windows 7 On Multicore: Up to 17% More Power Efficient
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st October 2009, 16:36   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,771
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Windows 7 On Multicore: Up to 17% More Power Efficient

InfoWorld's Andrew Binstock tests whether Windows 7's threading advances fulfill the promise of improved performance and energy reduction. He runs Windows XP Professional, Vista Ultimate, and Windows 7 Ultimate against Viewperf and Cinebench benchmarks using a Dell Precision T3500 workstation, the price-performance winner of an earlier roundup of Nehalem-based workstations. 'What might be surprising is that Windows 7's multithreading changes did not deliver more of a performance punch,' Binstock writes of the benchmarks, adding that the principal changes to Windows 7 multithreading consist of increased processor affinity, 'a wholly new mechanism that gets rid of the global locking concept and pushes the management of lock access down to the locked resources,' permitting Windows 7 to scale up to 256 processors without performance penalty, but delivering little performance gains for systems with only a few processors.


'Windows 7 performs several tricks to keep threads running on the same execution pipelines so that the underlying Nehalem processor can turn off transistors on lesser-used or inactive pipelines,' Binstock writes. 'The primary benefit of this feature is reduced energy consumption,' with Windows 7 requiring 17 percent less power to run than Windows XP or Vista.

http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows/w...uch-faster-325
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 21st October 2009 at 16:39.
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2009, 16:41   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,771
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

That's quite an interesting test he did there; 40W difference is no nothing
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Windows Home Server Power Pack 3 available November 24th jmke WebNews 2 20th November 2009 09:33
175 Windows 7 Tweaks, Tips, and How-To Articles jmke WebNews 2 23rd October 2009 15:00
Microsoft Patch Tuesday: 5 Criticals, 2 Important, 1 Moderate Patch jmke WebNews 0 14th April 2009 19:47
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for September 2008 jmke WebNews 0 9th September 2008 20:20
Windows Home Server Power Back 1 Released jmke WebNews 1 22nd July 2008 14:24
Ubuntu 8.04 vs. Windows Vista Power Usage jmke WebNews 1 28th April 2008 10:25
Linux vs. Windows Power Usage Sidney WebNews 0 17th October 2007 02:16
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for August 2007 jmke WebNews 0 14th August 2007 23:21
Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for June 2006 jmke WebNews 0 14th June 2006 21:51
List of fixes included in Windows XP Service Pack 2 jmke WebNews 1 17th August 2004 16:03

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO