It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Video Card Image Quality Comparison @ ExtremeTech Video Card Image Quality Comparison @ ExtremeTech
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Video Card Image Quality Comparison @ ExtremeTech
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th June 2004, 06:27   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Video Card Image Quality Comparison @ ExtremeTech

Quote:
The recent introduction of the GeForce 6800 and Radeon X800 has sparked a lot of debate about the relative merits of different graphics cards. NVidia chose to offers full support for Pixel and Vertex Shader model 3.0 and other features in DirectX 9.0c, while ATI avoided such new technologies for now, instead focusing on raw performance.


We dove deep into the new nVidia's architecture and performance in our earlier preview, then followed suit with a deep examination of ATI's new card. These articles, and most others like them, have focused on the performance and features of these new GPUs from the top two graphics companies. Here, however, we will focus primarily on issues of image quality, examining texture filtering and anti-aliasing quality.

Throughout this feature, the images we discuss are going to be much larger than you're used to seeing on ExtremeTech. You may need to scroll or resize the pop-up image window to get a good view. It was important that we didn't resize or overly compress the images, as that could affect image quality. Our game screens were captured at a resolution of 1024x768 – though these video cards can easily run games well at higher resolutions, our choice helps better display the effects of anti-aliasing. Also note that, unless otherwise stated, screenshots were taken with the default "quality" driver settings.
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...129TX1K0000532
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2004, 07:38   #2
Member
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

Those marketing folks sure know how to steal your heart and hard earned money.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th June 2004, 09:03   #3
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I don't really use FSAA or AF, it's not needed for Q3A
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Video Card Comparison Charts jmke Articles & Howto's 3 18th October 2009 18:10
[M] Video Card Comparison Charts jmke WebNews 1 15th September 2009 19:53
GPU video transcoding image quality - NVIDIA CUDA versus AMD Stream jmke WebNews 0 23rd July 2009 15:18
SPARKLE uses Diamonds For Video Card Cooling jmke WebNews 1 16th February 2009 15:01
NVIDIA vs ATI Image Quality Comparison (GTX260+ vs HD4850) jmke WebNews 0 11th February 2009 20:38
GeForce 8800 GTS Video Card Image Quality Explored jmke WebNews 0 9th May 2007 21:20
XFX releases the GeForce 7600 GT Fatal1ty Professional Series Video Card jmke WebNews 0 13th December 2006 11:10
4-WAY Video Card Water Block Comparison jmke WebNews 0 10th March 2006 08:58
ATI All in Wonder X800XT AGP Multimedia Video Card jmke WebNews 0 1st July 2005 16:46
Video Card Image Quality Comparison jmke WebNews 0 12th June 2004 21:47

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:33.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO