VIA Nano 1.8Ghz wipes floor with Intel Atom 1.6Ghz in Internet Benchmarks

jmke · 11th February 2009, 19:51

Email and web surfing are two of the most common tasks for netbooks, making performance in this area is of primary importance to netbook users. The VIA Nano emerges as the better processor for internet tasks. While the Atom needs 132.8 seconds to display simple HTML pages, the Nano does it in 70.1 seconds. But compared with the desktop processor, which finishes the same task in 33.3 seconds, even the Nano looks sluggish.

The same picture emerges in the Java and JavaScript tests, where the Nano clearly performs better than the Intel Atom. These tests are not academic exercises, because more and more web pages contain JavaScript. The SunSpider test is a good indicator of performance in this area, and browser manufacturers use it to measure the JavaScript performance of their engines. Intel's Atom takes nearly twice as much time to complete this test as the VIA Nano.

http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/...13937-1,00.htm

11th February 2009, 19:51	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,019	VIA Nano 1.8Ghz wipes floor with Intel Atom 1.6Ghz in Internet Benchmarks Email and web surfing are two of the most common tasks for netbooks, making performance in this area is of primary importance to netbook users. The VIA Nano emerges as the better processor for internet tasks. While the Atom needs 132.8 seconds to display simple HTML pages, the Nano does it in 70.1 seconds. But compared with the desktop processor, which finishes the same task in 33.3 seconds, even the Nano looks sluggish. The same picture emerges in the Java and JavaScript tests, where the Nano clearly performs better than the Intel Atom. These tests are not academic exercises, because more and more web pages contain JavaScript. The SunSpider test is a good indicator of performance in this area, and browser manufacturers use it to measure the JavaScript performance of their engines. Intel's Atom takes nearly twice as much time to complete this test as the VIA Nano. http://reviews.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/...13937-1,00.htm __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
First Intel Atom D510/D410 benchmarks are out	jmke	WebNews	0	11th December 2009 13:22
New Specialized Intel Atom Processor Targets Cars, Internet Phones	jmke	WebNews	0	5th March 2009 15:37
Atom 330 Benchmarks, compared to N270 Atom	jmke	WebNews	0	8th September 2008 11:06
Intel Atom vs. VIA Nano Platform Comparo	jmke	WebNews	0	12th August 2008 10:27
Via Nano Beats Intel Atom in HD Video PlayBack? Not Quite!	jmke	WebNews	0	4th August 2008 21:17
Intel Dothan (Pentium M 760) beats VIA Nano and Intel Atom	jmke	WebNews	1	31st July 2008 08:57
Intel Atom vs VIA Nano - Early Benchmarks	jmke	WebNews	2	29th July 2008 22:07
Real Intel Atom (1.6GHz) Benchmarks	jmke	WebNews	0	3rd June 2008 09:49
Intel Atom 230 (1.6Ghz) 4W TDP does SuperPi 1M in 92.766 Seconds	jmke	WebNews	2	30th May 2008 15:49
Intel Outlines Strategy for Making the Internet Smarter, Safer, More Reliable	Sidney	WebNews	0	9th September 2004 17:38