| Thread Tools |
11th March 2009, 23:09 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| USB 3.0 Specifications To Be Finalized In June, Speed Up To 5000Mbps USB 3.0 will, together with SATA 6Gbps take our storage medias to the next generation and even if the SATA interface gets a nice boost it is nothing compared to what the third generation of USB promises. USB 2.0 has a maximal transfer rate at 480Mbps, the USB 3.0 specifications sports a theoretical transfer rate of a whopping 5000Mbps. In other words almost as fast as the new internal Serial ATA interface. It has now been stated that the test specification of USB 3.0 will be ready for June, 2009. This means that manufacturers will be able to test their USB 3.0 products in final mode and the first commercial products are expected to surface at the start of 2010. http://www.nordichardware.com/news,8912.html
__________________ |
11th March 2009, 23:09 | #2 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| So this means USB SSD drives?
__________________ |
12th March 2009, 07:58 | #3 |
Posts: n/a
| Probably not, unless in a powered enclosure? High-performance SSDs draw more power than notebook drives. |
12th March 2009, 08:29 | #4 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| we don't know the power rating of USB 3.0 yet? or is that published somewhere?
__________________ |
12th March 2009, 18:54 | #5 |
Posts: n/a
| Looks like available power is increased from 500mA to 900mA... Your right, should be enough for a X25 I believe. |
12th March 2009, 22:19 | #6 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| that would also make other 2.5" and maybe 3.5" external storage powered over USB , less cable mess
__________________ |
13th March 2009, 07:08 | #7 |
Posts: n/a
| Using a SSD through USB doesn't make much sense to me. The USB... er, bus, introduces additional latency and if you've noticed even modest transfers of 30Mb/s (~240MB/s) require quite a few CPU cycles, somewhere around 20% on my 2Ghz T7200. Running 250Mb/s through the same (or very much the same) protocol will be kinda CPU hog, I suspect. Unless they've changed something radically, which I don't believe given the backward compatibility. |
13th March 2009, 08:07 | #8 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
| was more thinking about uber fast USB SSD based sticks
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TRENDnet Launches Two High Speed USB 3.0 Adapters | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 15th July 2010 16:41 |
ASUS Leads the Way for True USB 3.0 Integration in Complete Product Line | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 23rd March 2010 12:18 |
USB-IF Certifies Multiple GIGABYTE SuperSpeed USB 3.0 Motherboards | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 3rd March 2010 08:45 |
NEC triples USB 3.0 speed, up to 16Gb/s with new chip | jmke | WebNews | 1 | 17th February 2010 15:40 |
GIGABYTE Launches Industry’s First USB 3.0, SATA 6Gbps Solution on AMD Platform | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th November 2009 09:13 |
Super Talent Announces World's First USB 3.0 RAIDDrive | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 4th November 2009 10:45 |
Super speed: a brief history of USB 3.0, 2007-2018 | jmke | WebNews | 2 | 4th August 2009 13:34 |
USB 3.0 specification is now finalized | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th November 2008 15:34 |
USB 3.0 promises 10x speed increase | Shogun | WebNews | 0 | 18th November 2008 05:14 |
USB 3.0 Speed Tested and Demoed at IDF | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 21st August 2008 14:27 |
Thread Tools | |
| |