 |  |  |  |  |
Seagate Sata2 320GB vs. Western Digital Sata 2 320GB
| |||||||||
|
Seagate Sata2 320GB vs. Western Digital Sata 2 320GB
| | |||||||
 |
 |
| | Thread Tools |
1st September 2006, 13:25
| #1 |
| Madshrimp  Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,423
 | Seagate Sata2 320GB vs. Western Digital Sata 2 320GB Upon receiving these two shiny new hard drives, I noticed the difference in packaging techniques used by each manufacturer. The Seagate comes sealed in an antistatic bag with the end of it folded and taped closed. The Western Digital drive, on the other hand, is in an antistatic bag with moisture gathering beads, and the bag is heat sealed on both ends, requiring you to cut the bag open.
__________________  |
|  |
|
1st September 2006, 13:46
| #2 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,243
 |  some people fail so bad at reviews, it's just sad 90% of the users cannot notice those speed differences, but we all know which drive is the SPRC favourite with differences people can notice |
| |
|
1st September 2006, 16:30
| #3 | |
| [M] Reviewer  Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,887
| Quote:
__________________  | |
|
| |
|
1st September 2006, 20:52
| #4 |
| Member  Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Sydney
Posts: 268
| They're both decent drives. Get the one that's one that's on special  |
|
| |
|
1st September 2006, 20:55
| #5 |
| Member Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,243
| depends on the user type which drive is best |
|
| |
|
1st September 2006, 22:19
| #6 |
| Member Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,639
| 1 or 3 year vs 5 year warranty... that's all I need to know. Well, that and also the only drives I've had fail on me to date were WDs. :P |
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| |
