Schoolboy Corrects NASA's Math On Killer Asteroid

jmke · 16th April 2008, 13:32

A German schoolboy, Nico Marquardt, has revised NASA's figures for the chances that the Apophis asteroid will hit earth. Apparently if the asteroid hits a satellite in 2029, its path could be diverted enough to cause it to collide with Earth on the next orbit, in 2036. NASA had calculated the chances as 1 in 45,000 but the 13-year-old, in his science project, made it 1 in 450. NASA agreed

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5...vcC5GvbjD4MIOQ

Massman · 16th April 2008, 13:47

Cool ... Nasa got owned.

Not so cool ... an asteroid might hit earth.

wutske · 16th April 2008, 16:23

we just send some oil miners up there to detonate a nuke in the center of the asteroid ...

Funny that yet again we are the cause of the problem

geoffrey · 16th April 2008, 16:27

if it doesn't hit Earth the first time, then there is a possibility that it might hit it the second time. If it doesn't hit the second time then maybe third time, and if ...

I'm looking forward to meet the Asteroid non-the-less.

Kougar · 16th April 2008, 21:22

Actually, this seems rather unlikely even with the new consideration? The ISS orbits <400km, most satellites are nowhere near 30,000-35,000km.

geoffrey · 16th April 2008, 22:28

Around 1200 so I've red.

Kougar · 16th April 2008, 22:55

Hm, not a bad percentage out of 40,000 tracked objects then. Rather big oversight on NASA's part to not take it into consideration too.

16th April 2008, 13:32	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,420	Schoolboy Corrects NASA's Math On Killer Asteroid A German schoolboy, Nico Marquardt, has revised NASA's figures for the chances that the Apophis asteroid will hit earth. Apparently if the asteroid hits a satellite in 2029, its path could be diverted enough to cause it to collide with Earth on the next orbit, in 2036. NASA had calculated the chances as 1 in 45,000 but the 13-year-old, in his science project, made it 1 in 450. NASA agreed http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5...vcC5GvbjD4MIOQ __________________

16th April 2008, 16:23	#3
wutske Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Apenland Posts: 2,018	we just send some oil miners up there to detonate a nuke in the center of the asteroid ... Funny that yet again we are the cause of the problem __________________ /me = Hardfreak My Blog: [W]eblog

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
VisionTek cuts price of its Killer 2100 Gaming Network Card	jmke	WebNews	0	11th August 2010 17:56
DeepCool Killer Whale Premium Heatsink Review	jmke	WebNews	0	6th September 2009 10:48
DeepCool Killer Whale Heatsink Review	jmke	WebNews	0	4th September 2009 12:42
EVGA Bigfoot Networks Killer Xeno Pro Review	jmke	WebNews	0	19th June 2009 21:42
Xeno: Bigfoot's Second-Generation Killer NIC	jmke	WebNews	1	23rd March 2009 23:39
Bigfoot Networks Killer NIC network card Review	jmke	WebNews	0	9th August 2007 09:39
Bigfoot Networks Killer NIC & Killer K1 Network Cards	jmke	WebNews	0	22nd March 2007 10:25
BigFoot Networks Killer NIC: Killer Marketing or Killer Product?	jmke	WebNews	0	31st October 2006 07:41
Bigfoot Networks Killer NIC	jmke	WebNews	0	10th October 2006 06:56

16th April 2008, 13:47	#2
Massman [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem Posts: 6,465	Cool ... Nasa got owned. Not so cool ... an asteroid might hit earth.

16th April 2008, 16:27	#4
geoffrey [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 4,117	if it doesn't hit Earth the first time, then there is a possibility that it might hit it the second time. If it doesn't hit the second time then maybe third time, and if ... I'm looking forward to meet the Asteroid non-the-less.

16th April 2008, 21:22	#5
Kougar Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,639	Actually, this seems rather unlikely even with the new consideration? The ISS orbits <400km, most satellites are nowhere near 30,000-35,000km.

16th April 2008, 22:28	#6
geoffrey [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 4,117	Around 1200 so I've red.

16th April 2008, 22:55	#7
Kougar Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,639	Hm, not a bad percentage out of 40,000 tracked objects then. Rather big oversight on NASA's part to not take it into consideration too.