Samsung 226BW - the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

jmke · 10th May 2007, 09:32

So there were few orders in the beginning. Then in February, as Samsung promised, the situation returned to normal and clients finally received their screens. However, almost immediately a wave of discontent hit forums. A new version had appeared, recognized on the back of monitors by its sticker. Some were S series (those which we tested, « S » meaning whose panel’s origin was Samsung), other A series – for AU Optronics, a current competitor. The reputation of the « A » only got worse and the witch hunt began.

http://www.behardware.com/articles/6...e-verdict.html

10th May 2007, 09:32	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,416	Samsung 226BW - the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly So there were few orders in the beginning. Then in February, as Samsung promised, the situation returned to normal and clients finally received their screens. However, almost immediately a wave of discontent hit forums. A new version had appeared, recognized on the back of monitors by its sticker. Some were S series (those which we tested, « S » meaning whose panel’s origin was Samsung), other A series – for AU Optronics, a current competitor. The reputation of the « A » only got worse and the witch hunt began. http://www.behardware.com/articles/6...e-verdict.html __________________