It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
RAID 0: Hype or blessing? RAID 0: Hype or blessing?
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


RAID 0: Hype or blessing?
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 9th August 2004, 13:37   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,700
jmke has disabled reputation
Default RAID 0: Hype or blessing?

"Stop the RAID 0 insanity!" "There is no place, and no need for a RAID-0 array on a desktop computer." With these words Storage Review and AnandTech banished RAID 0, or striping, from their desktops. For several years, RAID 0 had been considered the Holy Grail for power users wanting to maximize performance from their hard drives. But according to these two websites the general opinion of pc-enthusiasts was misguided. In their eyes, RAID 0 was useless, a hype, and didn't improve performance on desktop machines at all. The world needed enlightment. No more striping or bragging about transfer rates.

'It is our hope that these findings taken as a whole will stem an internet-wide trend where enthusiast-oriented websites blithely incorporate RAID0 into their "high-end" single-user boxes, ignorant to both theory and empirical results', preached Storage Review.

Harsh words from two leading websites, that made us raise our eyebrows. After all, hadn't our own benchmarks shown time and time again that various RAID-setups can hugely benefit desktop systems? We'd often seen I/O performance increase by forty to sixty percent in striped environments. The over-simplified way in which especially Storage Review takes stance against RAID 0, combined with our doubts about the testing methods of both AnandTech and Storage Review, have led to this article. We can already reveal that our test results are such that there is absolutely no way we will follow Storage Review's advice against the use of striping.

http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/515
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2004, 14:10   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,700
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

from: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/08/1311241

1. Anandtech and StorageReview benchmarked RAID 0 and found that, for desktop applications, RAID 0 is slightly slower than a single drive, because the things that RAID 0 is good at are not the things that desktops need.

2. So we changed the benchmarks to really need the things that RAID 0 is good at.

3. And now, RAID 0 improves things!

4. Therefore, the benchmarks in #1 were wrong.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2004, 14:38   #3
[M] Reviewer
 
Bosw8er's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 3,711
Bosw8er Freshly Registered
Default

Personal observations

1) Raid 0 improved the speed noticeably, even while working with basic apps (mail, office, ..)
2) Quality of result of video editing was A LOT better than with 1 disk ... and the operation completed in less time
__________________
"Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that."
Bosw8er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2004, 16:50   #4
[M] Reviewer
 
Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,739
Sidney Freshly Registered
Default

Quote:
You don't judge a Porsche on its capabilities to carry groceries. A car like that serves a different purpose, and it should be judged on that instead - even if it will never fulfill its true purpose in real life. Power users, tweakers and hardware enthusiasts, the target audience AnandTech, Storage Review and Tweakers.net try to please, use their desktop systems in a different way than the pretty blonde next door who only uses it to check her Hotmail account.
__________________
lazyman

Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
Sidney is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Accordance ARAID 2200-GP RAID 5.25" Bay jmke WebNews 0 4th February 2009 15:20
Raid and Gaming Performance jmke WebNews 0 1st April 2008 19:52
SilverStone DS351 External RAID HDD Storage jmke WebNews 0 1st June 2007 13:39
Build a Cheap and Fast RAID 5 NAS jmke WebNews 0 2nd August 2006 08:58
The RAID 6 Storage Bodyguards jmke WebNews 0 2nd January 2006 23:25
Chipset Serial ATA and RAID performance compared jmke WebNews 0 8th December 2005 11:11
XFX's Revo64 Serial ATA RAID card Sidney WebNews 0 10th November 2005 16:08
Promise Technology Demonstrates RAID 6 And SATA 3G Solutions jmke WebNews 0 3rd March 2005 10:27
VIA Announces the VIA VT6421 PCI Serial ATA RAID Controller jmke WebNews 0 13th January 2004 10:12

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO