It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Quick and Dirty Quad-Core "Penryn" Benchmarks Quick and Dirty Quad-Core "Penryn" Benchmarks
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


  



Other Recent News
OCZ Launches New 800MHz Reaper HPC CAS 3 Series DDR2
European Commission Accuses Rambus of “Patent Ambush”

Similar Stories
Quick and Dirty AMD K10 Cinebench
  
Quick and Dirty Quad-Core "Penryn" Benchmarks


 
Thread Tools
24th August 2007, 10:05 [jmke] - #1
Default Quick and Dirty Quad-Core "Penryn" Benchmarks

Benchmarks of Intel’s Penryn based dual-core Wolfdale have appeared a couple times in the past month. The early benchmarks tested engineering sample processors and showed Wolfdale, on average, performing 5 percent faster, clock for clock then Conroe. However, benchmarks of the quad-core Yorkfield are virtually non-existent to the public.

Intel’s Yorkfield is not a native quad-core design. As with Kentsfield, Yorkfield features two dual-core dies fused together. The design results in each pair of cores having access to its own pool of shared L2 cache. Since Penryn has more cache, each pair of cores has access to 6MB of L2 for a total of 12MB – up from the 4MB per pair and 8MB total of Kentsfield.


http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=8585
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:20.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO