It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
QPI Unlocked on recent Intel Core i7 920 and 940 CPUs QPI Unlocked on recent Intel Core i7 920 and 940 CPUs
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


  



Other Recent News
Test your browser with SunSpider JavaScript Benchmark
Intel Gulftown 32nm 6-core CPU could work on X58 Motherboards

Similar Stories
Intel taking 6-core route for broken 8-core CPUs
Intel Core i7 makes up for 1% of consumer CPUs
Core Temp 0.99.3 Adds Correct TjMax for Intel Core 45nm CPUs
Intel Nehalem to be released as Core i7 CPUs
Critical update for Intel Core CPUs is out
  
QPI Unlocked on recent Intel Core i7 920 and 940 CPUs


 
Thread Tools
6th March 2009, 18:08 [jmke] - #1
Default QPI Unlocked on recent Intel Core i7 920 and 940 CPUs

One other known fact is that you cannot set the Turbo Mode ratios on the 940 and 920. OK fine. But what else is different? Intel told us as recently as two months ago that the QPI was locked at 4.8GT/s to prevent you from running it at the Extreme’s 6.4GT/s speed. Memory ratios, however, are supposed to be unlocked.

But maybe not.

After talking with Intel as well as some back channel contacts we had, we learned that the memory multipliers on production CPUs are unlocked. The reason our CPUs had locked multipliers, we were told by Intel, was because they are engineering sample chips. Engineering sample parts are pre-production CPUs provided to the media, OEMs, motherboard makers and various other hardware vendors to test and bring up components. These CPUs, we were told, are locked.

http://www.maximumpc.com/article/fea... ally_reported
6th March 2009, 20:19 [Kougar] - #2
Default

This is only just now becoming news?
6th March 2009, 22:10 [jmke] - #3
Default

this has been a known fact for long?
6th March 2009, 22:43 [Kougar] - #4
Default

Should've been noticed quickly after sites began buying their own CPUs, not almost six months later!

Had noticed the discrepancy between users and site reviews, but as I don't own a Core i7 I assumed the sites were correct and forum users were wrong.
7th March 2009, 09:37 [jmke] - #5
Default

turned out both were right though
Massman used the 965 for his testing so impossible to notice there
Closed Thread

Thread Tools



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:09.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO