| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
![]() | ![]() At 1280x1024, renaming the executable in ForceWare 169.04 gave us close to a 7% drop in performance. Utilising ForceWare 169.09, there is no longer any performance drop from renaming the Crysis executable, but performance overall is around 7% lower than that seen in the previous driver set, putting it on a par with the older driver with the game EXE renamed. This is still faster than the older ForceWare 163.69 WHQL driver, but suggests that much of the additional performance seen in ForceWare 169.01 through to 169.04 was due to that water reflection rendering issue. http://www.elitebastards.com/cms/ind...92&Item id=29
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NVIDIA ForceWare 257.15 Performance Analysis | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 25th May 2010 19:42 |
Driverheaven Nvidia Mobility Modder Released V1.1.0.0 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 6th August 2009 14:12 |
NVIDIA Forceware 177.92 Beta Driver Promises Performance Boost | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th August 2008 18:14 |
Crysis AA Performance: ATI HD4870X2 vs NVIDIA GTX 280 | jmke | WebNews | 5 | 21st August 2008 20:59 |
FPS Impact: NVIDIA Forceware 175.16 vs 175.19 | Massman | WebNews | 1 | 27th June 2008 10:44 |
Getting NVIDIA ForceWare 174 To Work With GeForce 8 Cards | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th March 2008 21:39 |
Nvidia spent 4 to 5 million on Crysis marketing | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 14th February 2008 15:09 |
NVIDIA Releases ForceWare 84.21 Drivers | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th March 2006 13:13 |
Nvidia Forceware Tweak Guide | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 16th February 2005 12:39 |
Nvidia Forceware Tweak Guide | Da_BoKa | WebNews | 0 | 15th February 2005 11:20 |
Thread Tools | |
| |