| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,019
![]() | ![]() Compared to Bulldozer there already is a nice collection of benchmark numbers for Sandy Bridge. For example those posted by Coolaler, a few BOINC benchmark results and a video with a mobile Sandy Bridge running Cinema 4D. The video analysis done in the Planet3DNow forums resulted in a deciphered score of 19641, confirmed by the measured run time (44 s). This means, the tested mobile Sandy Bridge processor was as fast as a Core i7-975 Extreme. Another comparison could be done by using a recently published Geekbench result of a 1.6 GHz Sandy Bridge CPU. So I compared it to a Core i7 also running at 1.6 GHz http://citavia.blog.de/2010/08/05/mo...mbers-9128712/
__________________ ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Early AMD Llano and Ontario performance numbers tip up | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 30th July 2010 10:10 |
Intel to Ramp Up Sandy Bridge Aggressively on Desktop Market | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th June 2010 00:00 |
Desktop Sandy Bridge uses socket 1155 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd March 2010 09:27 |
Intel Sandy Bridge supports PCIe 3.0 | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th February 2010 14:26 |
Sandy Bridge dual-core mobile CPU ~20 percent faster compared to Arrandale | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th February 2010 12:40 |
Thread Tools | |
| |