| ||Thread Tools|
|4th August 2008, 11:06||#1|
Join Date: May 2002
More Intel "GPU" Larrabee Architecture Disclosed
Well, it is important to keep in mind that this is first and foremost NOT a GPU. It's a CPU. A many-core CPU that is optimized for data-parallel processing. What's the difference? Well, there is very little fixed function hardware, and the hardware is targeted to run general purpose code as easily as possible. The bottom lines is that Intel can make this very wide many-core CPU look like a GPU by implementing software libraries to handle DirectX and OpenGL.
It's not quite emulating a GPU as it is directly implementing functionality on a data-parallel CPU that would normally be done on dedicated hardware. And developers will not be limited to just DirectX and OpenGL: this hardware can take pure software renderers and run them as if the hardware was designed specifically for that code.
Last edited by jmke : 4th August 2008 at 11:57.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Intel Kills Larrabee GPU, Will Not Bring a Discrete Graphics Product to Market||jmke||WebNews||0||25th May 2010 23:50|
|Intel Larrabee is set for a comeback||jmke||WebNews||0||17th March 2010 17:24|
|Intel Cancels Larrabee Retail Products||jmke||WebNews||4||6th December 2009 10:22|
|Intel Architecture Driving Future of Supercomputing||jmke||WebNews||0||16th November 2009 14:26|
|Intel Confirms 'Larrabee' First Half 2010; No Delay||jmke||WebNews||0||17th May 2009 00:04|
|Intel next generation architecture “LGA 1366” platform - GIGABYTE X58-EXTREME||windwithme||General Madness - System Building Advice||0||1st September 2008 16:13|
|Intel Larrabee has DirectX and OpenGL support||jmke||WebNews||0||21st July 2008 11:10|
|Intel Larrabee doesn't do DirectX ?||jmke||WebNews||1||17th July 2008 14:38|
|Intel will move Larrabee quickly into desktops, notebooks||jmke||WebNews||1||22nd May 2008 22:27|
|Intel to move to common CPU architecture||Sidney||WebNews||5||23rd August 2005 21:27|