It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Micron C400 mSATA (128GB) SSD Review Micron C400 mSATA (128GB) SSD Review
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Micron C400 mSATA (128GB) SSD Review
Thread Tools
Old 11th April 2012, 08:10   #1
[M] Reviewer
Stefan Mileschin's Avatar
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Romania
Posts: 97,615
Stefan Mileschin Freshly Registered
Default Micron C400 mSATA (128GB) SSD Review

The arrival of affordable, high-performance client SSDs gave us two (closely related) things: 1) a high-speed primary storage option that could work in both a notebook or a desktop, and 2) independence from traditional hard drive form factors.

Unlike traditional hard drives, solid state storage didn't have the same correlation between performance and physical size. The 2.5" form factor was chosen initially because of the rising popularity of notebooks and the fact that desktops could use a 2.5" drive with the aid of a cheap adapter. Since then, many desktop cases now ship with 2.5" drive bays.

It turns out that even the 2.5 wide, 9.5mm tall form factor was a bit overkill for many SSDs. We saw the first examples of this with the arrival of drives from Corsair and Kingston, where the majority of the 2.5" enclosure went unused. Intel and others also launched 1.8" versions of their SSDs with performance levels comparable to their 2.5" counterparts.

Moore's Law ensures that large SSDs can be delivered in small packages. Take the original Intel X25-M for example. The first 80GB and 160GB drives used a 50nm 4GB MLC NAND die (1 or 2 die per package), across twenty packages. Intel's SSD 320, on the other hand, uses 25nm NAND to deliver 300GB or 600GB of storage in the same package configuration. As with all things Moore's Law enables, you can scale in both directions - either increase capacity in a 2.5" form factor, or enable smaller form factors with the same capacity.

The Ultrabook movement has encouraged development of the latter. While Apple and ASUS (among others) have picked custom form factors for their smallest form factor SSDs, there's always a need for standardization. One option is the mSATA form factor:
Stefan Mileschin is offline   Reply With Quote

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MyDigitalSSD DDR2 Super Cache 32GB mSATA Solid State Drive Review Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 20th February 2012 06:18
RunCore RCP V mSATA T50 SATA III 120GB SSD Review Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 4th January 2012 07:03
Intel, Micron Introduce of World's First 128Gb NAND Device Stefan Mileschin WebNews 0 8th December 2011 06:39
Renice X3 120GB 50mm mSATA 3Gbps 120GB SSD Review jmke WebNews 0 25th July 2011 15:49
Crucial m4 256GB / Micron RealSSD C400 256GB SATA3 SSD Review jmke WebNews 0 20th July 2011 14:49
Crucial M4 256GB SSD Review (C400) jmke WebNews 0 8th June 2011 14:49
MyDigitalSSD 50mm Bullet Proof mSATA PCIe 64GB SSD Review jmke WebNews 0 23rd May 2011 10:05
Crucial m4 (Micron C400) SSD Review jmke WebNews 0 31st March 2011 10:36
Crucial m4 256GB (C400) SSD Review jmke WebNews 0 29th March 2011 08:09
Crucial Announces RealSSD C400 jmke WebNews 0 5th January 2011 15:04

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:21.

Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO