| Thread Tools |
24th December 2005, 01:47 | #1 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,024
| Intel's multi-FSB chipsets go back to the future WHILE MANY other high-end processors had multiple buses, scalable SMP interconnects and so on long time ago, alleviating the SMP scaling bottleneck somewhat, Intel still sticks to the old "single clogged FSB" approach, resulting in choppy SMP scaling performance even when using CPUs with humungous caches, like the 8 MB XeonMP or 9 MB Itanium 2. If there wasn't Opteron, Intel could probably continue like this forever, but, as we all know, Opteron is here and, despite AMD's sometimes amateurish business attitude, it does, with its superb scaling, steal quite a bit of high-end dough from Intel these days. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=28533
__________________ |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Motherboard makers not keen on Intel's G4x chipsets | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 13th October 2009 14:24 |
Intel and NVIDIA to work out a deal for future motherboard chipsets? | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 19th February 2009 18:46 |
Back to the future, GeForce 181.20/22 tested | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 10th February 2009 19:55 |
Looking Back - The 6800 Ultra, ForceWare, and the Future | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 11th May 2006 11:52 |
Build a back door for Intel's DTCP-IP, pay US$8 million | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 9th March 2006 13:08 |
Intel's Recent Chipsets Show Poor Sales | Sidney | WebNews | 0 | 9th May 2005 06:35 |
Intel's 3.46EE with 1066 FSB and 925XE | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 2nd November 2004 18:13 |
ABIT Makes Step Back Towards NVIDIA’s Chipsets | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 25th October 2004 09:36 |
Intel's 925XE: Does Beating the 1-GHz FSB Barrier Matter? | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 12th October 2004 17:56 |
Thread Tools | |
| |