Intel’s CEO Denounces Company’s Employees: Dissatisfied with Intel's Execution

jmke · 28th July 2004, 16:22

Following the sequence of product delays, Intel’s chief executive officer Craig Barrett addressed the company’s management and employees a letter criticizing the company’s execution and vowing for all-out mobilization to bring the company back on track in terms of technology.

Intel Corporation’s latest products, such as Pentium 4 “Prescott” processor, Pentium M “Dothan” processor, as well as some other SKUs, including the forthcoming mobile chipset code-named Alviso, all faced delays because of various reasons. Furthermore, the company had to call back certain Grantsdale and Alderwood (i915 and i925X) chipset products as a result of a flaw with process technology, which cost the firm about $38 million.

The company has never experienced so many product postponements and even though the firm still delivers positive financial results its CEO addressed the technology issues with his letter parts from which are published by News.com web-site.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/d...728075703.html

Sidney · 28th July 2004, 17:02

Craig Barrett is running 12 months behind in his letter to Intel employees.

28th July 2004, 16:22	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,021	Intel’s CEO Denounces Company’s Employees: Dissatisfied with Intel's Execution Following the sequence of product delays, Intel’s chief executive officer Craig Barrett addressed the company’s management and employees a letter criticizing the company’s execution and vowing for all-out mobilization to bring the company back on track in terms of technology. Intel Corporation’s latest products, such as Pentium 4 “Prescott” processor, Pentium M “Dothan” processor, as well as some other SKUs, including the forthcoming mobile chipset code-named Alviso, all faced delays because of various reasons. Furthermore, the company had to call back certain Grantsdale and Alderwood (i915 and i925X) chipset products as a result of a flaw with process technology, which cost the firm about $38 million. The company has never experienced so many product postponements and even though the firm still delivers positive financial results its CEO addressed the technology issues with his letter parts from which are published by News.com web-site. http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/other/d...728075703.html __________________

28th July 2004, 17:02	#2
Sidney Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 15,738	Craig Barrett is running 12 months behind in his letter to Intel employees. __________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Corsair Distributes Over $1 Million Dollars in Profit Sharing to its Employees	jmke	WebNews	0	25th October 2006 11:07
Analyst Denounces Intel’s First Quad-Core Chip	jmke	WebNews	2	2nd March 2006 16:19
Intel’s Xeon Chips Set to Acquire 1333MHz Bus	jmke	WebNews	0	27th November 2005 17:12
Intel's 65nm Processors Overclocking Preview: 4.5Ghz no problem	jmke	WebNews	2	25th October 2005 21:50