It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel Q6600 Stands Strong Against Q8200/Q8300 Intel Q6600 Stands Strong Against Q8200/Q8300
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel Q6600 Stands Strong Against Q8200/Q8300
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16th February 2009, 17:25   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,001
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Intel Q6600 Stands Strong Against Q8200/Q8300

In spite of its age, the Core 2 Quad Q6600 still has some life in it. Intel is having trouble replacing it with anything really convincing, so much so that it is still in the Intel range, unlike many 65nm CPUs. Obviously constraints are more commercial than technical here:« although the Q8200/Q8300s aren’t much better, they are significantly more profitable!

But does the consumer really gain as much as Intel? In terms of efficiency, whether in load or at rest, these top drawer processors do have the advantage. Performance is also at a good level: the impact of the reduction in L2 cache is less significant than we might have thought and the Penryn (Core 2 45nm) brings several improvements on the Conroe (Core 2 65nm), sometimes making all the difference.

http://www.behardware.com/articles/7...the-q6600.html
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2009, 21:35   #2
Rutar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

They forget the aspect that some of the Intel fabs are still on 65nm, so the Q6600 has been an excellent way to put that production to good use while more and more capacity is switched to 45nm.

I expect however, that overall demand is so low now that the 45nm fabs aren't running at full capacity, hence it might be better to phase it out quicker than planned.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2009, 23:13   #3
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Very true, but as they said it is still much less profitable for them. Probably is why the Q6600 will be EOL'd and last orders taken May 8th.

Amazing to think just two years ago the Q6600 was $851, not $180.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
7 Intel CPUs Including Q6600 Phase Out By Q2 2009 jmke WebNews 0 3rd February 2009 14:53
Intel cuts Core 2 Quad Q6600, Q8200 prices jmke WebNews 0 22nd October 2008 13:20
PCGH Review: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 versus Q6600 and Phenom X4 Massman WebNews 0 22nd September 2008 11:48
Cheap Quad Cores: AMD X4 9600 €99 and Intel Q6600 €126 jmke WebNews 0 4th August 2008 12:48
Intel price drop for Q6600 and 45nm Core 2 Duo's jmke WebNews 0 21st July 2008 20:47
Intel Q6600 Still Very Popular jmke WebNews 9 19th July 2008 23:50
Intel Core2Quad Q6600 overclocking guide Sidney WebNews 0 15th November 2007 01:18
Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0 Stepping: Cheap Quad Core Just Got Better jmke WebNews 6 17th August 2007 15:34
Intel Core 2 Q6600 Performance Test jmke WebNews 0 8th January 2007 14:58
Intel pulls curtain back on the Core 2 Quad Q6600 jmke WebNews 0 8th January 2007 14:57

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:04.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO