It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel presents Self Tuning processor Intel presents Self Tuning processor
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel presents Self Tuning processor
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12th October 2009, 12:36   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Intel presents Self Tuning processor

Intel has presented a new processor design that uses Self Tuning. In short this means that processor optimizes itself for its intended use, according to several parameters like clock frequency, voltage and temperature. Both CPU core and cache memory comes with a chip for troubleshooting that directly notices if anything is wrong and automatically adjusts the properties of the processor to reduce the chance of damage or crash.

The technology enables processors to operate, more or less, with optimal performance and power consumption automatically. Would it be hot in the summer and the CPU temperature rises the temperature can clock down, or cold in the Winter it can increase performance, much like an advanced version of Intel's Turbo Boost technology.

http://www.nordichardware.com/news,10027.html
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 12:36   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Average Joe gets automatic overclocking, the complete package.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 13:11   #3
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

Nothing special in my humble opinion. Just more advanced turbo mode.
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 13:45   #4
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

OCing will not get more mainstream , quite a difference compared to a few years back when any change in FSB/Multi was strictly controlled by CPU, Motherboard and BIOS.
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 15:20   #5
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

OCing will or will not get more ... ?
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 15:55   #6
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

OCing will not get more mainstream



with a CPU that auto overclocks, and overvolts; what more is there to tweak?
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 16:08   #7
[M] Reviewer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Waregem
Posts: 6,466
Massman Freshly Registered
Default

memory, memory controller, vga card, pci-e ...
__________________
Massman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 17:38   #8
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

I knew you were going to come with that... but memory speed doesn't matter

memory and memory controller hasn't had a significant impact since Athlon XP and Pentium 4 northwood. don't see this changing anytime soon, current CPU infrastructure is far from bandwidth starved.

VGA has already passed the self-tuning stage, pre-overclocked editions are nothing new anymore, OC on VGA has been around for quite some time now. VGA have gone to the next stage; it's as if Intel would be selling pre-overclocked CPUs

no no, teh fun and advantage of overclocking your hardware to get a faster PC for less money has been going down the drain; mainstream OC is for PR another way to get money from PC enthusiasts. In the past OCing was a way to spare some money, OCing a Celeron 300 to 600Mhz did actually double your overall PC performance. Nowadays you can't even see the difference between a C2D system running stock 3ghz or OC'ed to 5Ghz, without resorting to benchmarks.
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 12th October 2009 at 17:41.
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 22:39   #9
Kougar
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
In the past OCing was a way to spare some money, OCing a Celeron 300 to 600Mhz did actually double your overall PC performance.
For some, yes. I'd say today it is more of a way to extend the value of whatever CPU is purchased.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmke View Post
Nowadays you can't even see the difference between a C2D system running stock 3ghz or OC'ed to 5Ghz, without resorting to benchmarks.
Hyperbole much? I agree on the principle, I wouldn't notice 500Mhz overclocks anymore. But I do easily notice a 1.54Ghz overclock, and I don't even use an SSD yet. Maybe you don't play enough FPS shooters...


I do agree with JMKe in that overclocking the GPU is almost all hype at this point. GPU's are so tightly binned to make factory overclocked models that stable OCing is usually minimal on them... to be expected when 3 to as many as 5 factory-overclocked versions of the same model exist at the same time.

PCIe overclocking has minimal impact with huge stability repercussions, almost the same with RAM unfortunately. The only thing I had serious fun overclocking was my CPU... only a little fun with the GPU.

At any rate, a more self-aware CPU would be a step ahead... being able to make adjustments or change setting to the tuning program would be great, not to mention actual info that something was marginally unstable at the physical level...

Last edited by Kougar : 12th October 2009 at 22:41.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 22:43   #10
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,021
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

Quote:
For some, yes. I'd say today it is more of a way to extend the value of whatever CPU is purchased.
in that case you would clock your CPU to match that of a more expensive CPU. With auto OC you buy Core i5 and get Core i7 performance

Quote:
Maybe you don't play enough FPS shooters..
don't know what FPS shooters have to do with this... ? name your poison

Quote:
At any rate, a more self-aware CPU would be a step ahead...
for the "masses"
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i5-655K Processor BX80616I5655K jmke WebNews 0 29th July 2010 15:11
New Specialized Intel Atom Processor Targets Cars, Internet Phones jmke WebNews 0 5th March 2009 15:37
Interactive Intel processor product ID guide v2.0 Sidney WebNews 0 8th August 2007 02:50
Intel Set To Release Low-Cost Dual-Core Processor : Pentium D805 jmke WebNews 0 23rd January 2006 17:14
Intel Unveils Last Single-Core Xeon Processor jmke WebNews 0 28th September 2005 21:08
Intel Slashes Intel Xeon Processor Pricing jmke WebNews 0 12th September 2005 18:58
Intel to Ship 2 Millionth 64-bit Xeon Processor This Month. jmke WebNews 0 14th February 2005 09:59
Intel Expands Centrino Mobile Tech With Pentium M Processor 765 jmke WebNews 1 21st October 2004 16:14
Intel to Discontinue Pentium 4 Extreme Edition Processor jmke WebNews 0 9th August 2004 13:54
Intel Expands Centrino Processor Options - Intel Corp. Debuts New Pentium M, Celeron jmke WebNews 0 8th April 2004 10:17

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:23.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO