| |||||||||
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
| Thread Tools |
![]() | #1 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
![]() | ![]() IDF — Intel CEO Paul Otellini announced today in his keynote address at the Intel Developer Forum that Intel will be moving its future CPUs to a common architecture. He said the architecture will incorporate the best of the current Netburst and mobile architectures, with a focus on delivering more performance per watt. The architecture will be used in mobile platforms (code-named Merom), desktops (Conroe), and servers (Woodcrest). This processor architecture will feature a range of next-generation Intel technologies, including 64-bit compatibility (EM64T), virtualization (VT), Intel's LaGrande security features, and Intel Active Management Tech (iAMT). These CPUs are dual-core products built on Intel's 65nm process technology, and Otellini presented live demos of all three processors running various operating systems. Otellini's presentation was driven by a Merom-based laptop. He showed Linux running on the desktop-targeted Conroe chip and Windows Server 2003 on Woodcrest. Otellini said the silicon is already "running quite well," and the company expects to ship products in the second half of 2006. Otellini said Conroe should deliver five times the performance per watt of the Netburst microarchitecture in desktop platforms. Before this new architecture debuts, Intel will still deliver its first generation of 65nm processsors for mobile (Yonah), desktops (Presler), and servers (Dempsey) in the first half of 2006. Unfortunately, Otellini's address has so far been short on nitty-gritty details of the new architecture, such as the possible integration of a memory controller, changes to bus technology, or microarchtectural innovations. We will be hunting for additional details and reporting them back to you as they become available. http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/8694
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #2 | |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
![]() | ![]() Quote:
![]() Everybody is awake now.
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II | |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #3 |
Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,020
![]() | ![]() in that department A64 is way ahead ![]()
__________________ ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #4 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
![]() | ![]() Yeap, everybody is trying to solve Intel's problem (heat), except Intel. Now Intel sets a new standard "performance per watt".
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #5 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
![]() | ![]() The title should have been "Intel moves to better use of common sense".
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | #6 |
Member Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,738
![]() | ![]() Streamlined pipelines The new architecture behind Merom, Conroe and Woodcrest contains a number of technological enhancements, but it also harks back to earlier designs. The chips will have a 14-stage pipeline, said Steve Smith, vice president of the Digital Enterprise Group. The pipeline is like a chip's assembly line. More stages allow a chip to run at faster speeds, but also mean greater power consumption. While earlier Pentium III and II chips had similar-size pipelines, the Pentium 4 had a 20-stage pipeline when it debuted and a bloated 31 stages in later chips. Many analysts blamed the power consumption problems in the Pentium 4 in part on the long pipeline. The chips will also not include hyperthreading, which lets a single core perform more than one task at once, to cut power consumption, said Smith. He added, however, that threading may be added in future versions of chips based on this architecture. Smith also said that the cores on these chips will share a single cache, similar to IBM's Power 4 dual-core chips. AMD's and Intel's current dual-core chips have separate caches. Additionally, the chips will come with an improved out-of-order execution unit, which improves performance by allowing a chip to complete tasks without having to wait until other calculations are complete. http://news.com.com/Intel+powers+up+...l?tag=nefd.top
__________________ lazyman Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Intel prepares Core i7 875K CPU | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 22nd March 2010 13:16 |
Intel Clarkdale Core i5-661 CPU Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 29th January 2010 16:34 |
The FTC Sues Intel Over CPU & GPU Competition | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 17th December 2009 13:24 |
Intel Core i7 960 versus 975 Extreme CPU Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 26th November 2009 10:25 |
IntelBurnTest v1.5.1 released - Linpack Based Intel CPU Load Test Program | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 27th August 2008 19:27 |
Intel Nehalem CPU B1 Stepping Photo | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 18th August 2008 17:19 |
More Intel "GPU" Larrabee Architecture Disclosed | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 4th August 2008 11:06 |
Intel E8500 Core2 Duo CPU Review | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 25th March 2008 11:26 |
Dual-core desktop CPU bout: AMD vs. Intel | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 28th November 2005 23:28 |
Intel dual-core 840 CPU and 955X chipset due this month | jmke | WebNews | 0 | 11th April 2005 16:45 |
Thread Tools | |
| |