It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
Intel Core i3 530 Review: Great for Overclockers & Gamers Intel Core i3 530 Review: Great for Overclockers & Gamers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Intel Core i3 530 Review: Great for Overclockers & Gamers
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 22nd January 2010, 10:56   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,738
jmke has disabled reputation
Default Intel Core i3 530 Review: Great for Overclockers & Gamers

Priced at $113 (and selling for about $125 on the street) the 530 runs at 2.93GHz and features no turbo modes. Itíll run at 1.33GHz at its lowest frequency, and no faster than 2.93GHz at full load. The missing turbo boost is almost all you sacrifice as the 530 still has a hefty 4MB L3 cache shared between both cores. Each core gets a 256KB 10-cycle L2, just like the i5s and i7s.

The un-core is clocked at 2.13GHz, down from 2.40GHz in the i5. That should hurt performance a bit compared to our simulated i3 in the launch article. Aside from Turbo the other thing you give up with the i3 is AES acceleration. Westmere's AES New Instructions (AES-NI) are disabled on all of the i3s in typical Intel fashion. There has to be some reason for users to opt for a Core i5 instead.

http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets...oc.aspx?i=3724
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2010, 11:04   #2
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,738
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

No need to upgrade to Core i3/i5 with IGP if you currently have Core 2 Duo Wolfdale with dedicated GFX
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/default.aspx?p=56&p2=118

clock for clock Core i3/i5 is not noticeably faster in my humble opinion
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2010, 00:41   #3
Tenoq
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And if you've got a Conroe @ 3.4 - also no reason to upgrade?
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd January 2010, 09:01   #4
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 78,738
jmke has disabled reputation
Default

your upgrade path should be S1366 Core i7 in my humble opinion to get a noticeable speed boost
going either Core i5 clarkdale or AMD Phenom won't make a huge amount of difference;

S1156 I would not invest in for the price/performance sake; seeing as the S1366 platform is more mature and geared towards better performance
__________________
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Intel Core i3 530 and i3 540 jmke WebNews 0 16th February 2010 15:34
Intel Core i5 661 Processor Review jmke WebNews 0 9th February 2010 10:38
Intel Core i5 661 Dual Core LGA 1156 Processor Review jmke WebNews 0 8th February 2010 14:42
Intel Clarkdale Core i5-661 CPU Review jmke WebNews 0 29th January 2010 15:34
Intel Core i5 750 and Core i7 860 CPU Review jmke WebNews 0 27th January 2010 09:15
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0GHz 1333MHz FSB Processor Review jmke WebNews 0 10th May 2009 13:52
Intel Core i7 Nehalem 965 XE review jmke WebNews 0 24th November 2008 14:48
[M] Intel Core 2 Extreme CPU Cooler Review jmke WebNews 1 2nd July 2008 12:50
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 CPU Review jmke WebNews 0 6th September 2007 09:02
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Processor Review thorgal WebNews 0 15th March 2007 10:08

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:00.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO