| ||Thread Tools|
|19th December 2005, 20:26||#1|
Join Date: May 2002
Intel Core Duo (Yonah) Performance Preview - Part II
At the end of November we finally did what we had been waiting to do for so long - provide the first performance benchmarks of Intel’s Yonah processor, the dual core successor to the highly acclaimed Pentium M. However, our initial performance investigation was not without its flaws. Given the short amount of time we had for benchmarking we were forced to compare to older numbers from previous reviews, which unfortunately lacked updated gaming, encoding and 3D rendering tests.
Despite the shortcomings of the initial article, we did manage to get a good look at the performance we could expect from Yonah. Mainly, that it was a fairly strong successor to the single core Pentium M and even more impressive was that it offered performance equal to that of AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 without an on-die memory controller. Many AnandTech readers kept our methods in check however by quickly pointing out that the Yonah vs. Athlon 64 X2 comparison wasn’t exactly fair, as Yonah is equipped with a full 2MB of L2 cache, whereas the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ we were comparing it against only had 512KB per processor, possibly painting Yonah in a better light.
So for this follow-up we’ve done two important things; for starters, we’ve updated the benchmark suite considerably, including modern day games and a few professional-level applications to hopefully get a better perspective on Yonah’s performance. We’ve also included an Athlon 64 X2 running at 2.0GHz, but with each core having a full 1MB L2 cache, making the Yonah vs. X2 comparison as close to even as possible (not mentioning the fact that AMD has twice the advantage in this round, with both a larger L1 cache and an on-die memory controller, but it should make things interesting).
We won’t be revisiting the issue of power consumption, as we already did that at the end of our last article but needless to say, Yonah is the most efficient dual core processor we’ve tested to date. Granted that it does have the advantage of being on Intel’s 65nm process whereas the Athlon 64 X2 is still based on AMD’s 90nm process, but given that AMD is around a year away from transitioning to 65nm it is an advantage that Intel has the right to enjoy.
|20th December 2005, 13:41||#2|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Price will determine the victor I assume.
Opteron 165 (2) @2.85 1.42 vcore AMD Stock HSF + Chill Vent II
|20th December 2005, 14:09||#3|
Join Date: Apr 2005
well, I can buy an Desktop x2 right now and get a motherboard easily (infact, I just did)
Can I do the same for a Yonah? Not really it's a pain in the *** finding a motherboard and it isn't cheap either.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 Processor||jmke||WebNews||0||7th June 2008 20:36|
|Intel Penryn Preview - Part I: Wolfdale Performance||jmke||WebNews||4||23rd August 2007 16:10|
|Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 2.66 GHz 1333MHz FSB Processor Review||jmke||WebNews||0||20th August 2007 19:49|
|Intel Core 2 Duo E4300: Affordable and Highly Overclockable||jmke||WebNews||1||10th January 2007 11:02|
|Intel Core 2 Q6600 Performance Test||jmke||WebNews||0||8th January 2007 14:58|
|Intel Core 2 Duo vs Core 2 Quad||jmke||WebNews||0||27th November 2006 19:05|
|Intel Core 2 Duo E4300 to be released on 21st Jan 07||jmke||WebNews||3||16th November 2006 06:54|
|Intel Mobile Core 2 Duo "Merom" Bench-Test and Showcase||jmke||WebNews||0||28th August 2006 21:51|
|NVIDIA Brings the Power of SLI Technology to Intel Core 2 Duo Platforms||jmke||WebNews||0||6th June 2006 14:02|
|Intel's Core Duo Launch - Notebook Performance Revealed||jmke||WebNews||0||8th January 2006 19:02|