Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Overclocking Report

jmke · 25th July 2007, 11:19

ne comparison that we’ve made in the office over the last week or so since we started really tinkering with our Core 2 Quad Q6600 is to the Athlon XP 2500+ for those of you that remember that CPU. At the time, AMD’s flagship processor was the XP 3200+, which was clocked at 11x200MHz. The XP 2500+ shared the same multiplier as the 3200+, but used the slower 166MHz front side bus speed.

Getting flagship performance out of the XP 2500+ was as simple as increasing the front side bus from 166MHz to 200MHz – virtually every processor did that on stock volts. I think we’re going to see something similar with the Core 2 Quad Q6600 – it shares the same multiplier as the Core 2 Extreme QX6850, but uses a 1066MHz front side bus instead of 1333MHz.

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...2_quad_q6600/1

Kougar · 26th July 2007, 00:14

Interesting P5K vs 680i OC comparison, but unfortunately they were using a B3 revision Q6600 for their tests.

Kougar · 26th July 2007, 01:44

Interesting... They claim it is an XFX board, but they are using a eVGA board in their photo

Rutar · 26th July 2007, 09:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kougar

Interesting P5K vs 680i OC comparison, but unfortunately they were using a B3 revision Q6600 for their tests.

It is pretty much common knowledge that the P35 is better than the 680.

25th July 2007, 11:19	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,423	Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Overclocking Report ne comparison that we’ve made in the office over the last week or so since we started really tinkering with our Core 2 Quad Q6600 is to the Athlon XP 2500+ for those of you that remember that CPU. At the time, AMD’s flagship processor was the XP 3200+, which was clocked at 11x200MHz. The XP 2500+ shared the same multiplier as the 3200+, but used the slower 166MHz front side bus speed. Getting flagship performance out of the XP 2500+ was as simple as increasing the front side bus from 166MHz to 200MHz – virtually every processor did that on stock volts. I think we’re going to see something similar with the Core 2 Quad Q6600 – it shares the same multiplier as the Core 2 Extreme QX6850, but uses a 1066MHz front side bus instead of 1333MHz. http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/200...2_quad_q6600/1 __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Intel latest Core 2 series CPU-Pentium E6300 and Quad Q8400 performance review	windwithme	Hardware Overclocking and Case Modding	3	19th June 2009 08:54
Intel cuts Core 2 Quad Q6600, Q8200 prices	jmke	WebNews	0	22nd October 2008 13:20
PCGH Review: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 versus Q6600 and Phenom X4	Massman	WebNews	0	22nd September 2008 11:48
INTEL Q6600 Quad Core Processor Review	Sidney	WebNews	4	18th September 2007 17:15
Intel Core 2 Q6600 G0 Stepping: Cheap Quad Core Just Got Better	jmke	WebNews	6	17th August 2007 15:34
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600	jmke	WebNews	0	20th February 2007 08:04
Intel pulls curtain back on the Core 2 Quad Q6600	jmke	WebNews	0	8th January 2007 14:57
Intel Q6600 Quad core launches on the 7th Jan 2007	jmke	WebNews	5	20th December 2006 21:34
Biostar TF680i SLI Deluxe: get ready for overclocking of Intel Core 2 Quad processor	jmke	WebNews	0	8th November 2006 13:39

26th July 2007, 00:14	#2
Kougar Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,639	Interesting P5K vs 680i OC comparison, but unfortunately they were using a B3 revision Q6600 for their tests.

26th July 2007, 01:44	#3
Kougar Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 1,639	Interesting... They claim it is an XFX board, but they are using a eVGA board in their photo