GeForce GT 240 vs. GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon 4670

jmke · 25th November 2009, 12:36

When compared with GeForce 9600GT, the reference GT240 card lags behind by 5%, but Galaxy’s factory overclocked GT240 has managed to limit the difference to 0.13%. The catch is, however, it doesn’t offer an attractive cost performance compared to the competitors with similar performance, but it’s still a good choice if you want a modest card under one hundred dollars

3DMark Vantage

Game Benchmarks

Game Benchmarks with PhysX

Price Comparison

Src: http://en.expreview.com/2009/11/24/g...low-power.html

25th November 2009, 12:36	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 79,010	GeForce GT 240 vs. GeForce 9600 GT vs Radeon 4670 When compared with GeForce 9600GT, the reference GT240 card lags behind by 5%, but Galaxy’s factory overclocked GT240 has managed to limit the difference to 0.13%. The catch is, however, it doesn’t offer an attractive cost performance compared to the competitors with similar performance, but it’s still a good choice if you want a modest card under one hundred dollars 3DMark Vantage Game Benchmarks Game Benchmarks with PhysX Price Comparison Src: http://en.expreview.com/2009/11/24/g...low-power.html Attached Thumbnails __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
NVIDIA GT220 Benchmarks Released: Radeon 4670 vs Geforce GT220	jmke	WebNews	0	12th October 2009 11:35
ATI HD Radeon 4670 Official Reviews Released	jmke	WebNews	0	10th September 2008 11:05
NVidia considers an across-the-board overhaul of its marketing strategy	Shogun	WebNews	4	9th May 2008 14:08
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT: Worthy Rival to ATI Radeon HD 3000	jmke	WebNews	0	10th March 2008 12:23
GeForce 9600 GT vs. Radeon HD 3870	jmke	WebNews	0	26th February 2008 16:53