It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
Go Back [M] > Madshrimps > WebNews
DDRdrive X1 vs Fusion-io ioDrive - RAM Drive Shootout DDRdrive X1 vs Fusion-io ioDrive - RAM Drive Shootout
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


DDRdrive X1 vs Fusion-io ioDrive - RAM Drive Shootout
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th May 2009, 08:09   #1
Madshrimp
 
jmke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 7090/Belgium
Posts: 79,001
jmke has disabled reputation
Default DDRdrive X1 vs Fusion-io ioDrive - RAM Drive Shootout

For the DDRdrive to perform as well as it does with only one lane of PCI-Express, it must employ extremely low latency tech. There are as few components as possible between the PCI bus and the RAM, and those parts are as speed optimized as possible. With such a fast turnaround time, we found that unleashing the true potential of the DDRdrive required moving to a board without a beefy video card. Newer video cards like the Geforce GTX series tend to assume they own the PCI-E bus, meaning other devices have to repeatedly arbitrate to communicate with the CPU. The added latency of waiting for a hefty video card to release the bus adds up, leading to an unnecessary bottleneck at extremely high IOPS. Given the target market for the X1 is the enterprise sector, it is not unreasonable to assume these units would be put to use in displayless server environments.


We reached over 280k IOPS with IOMeter. Not quite 300k, but given the added overhead by IOMeter itself, it is safe to say the control panel application was being truthful. The DDRdrive really shines in single sector random access, literally blowing everything else out of the water. At such insanely high IOPS, the CPU quickly becomes the bottleneck. For reads, the dual X1 setup gets slightly lower values due to the pair being installed in PCI-E 1x slots as opposed to the single unit installed in the PCI-E x16 slot. x16 is not significant, but the lower latency link to the CPU is. For writes, the extra bandwidth helps the dual setup achieve higher IOPS, but is still ultimately bottlenecked by the CPU.

The DDRdrive X1 (Limited capacity of 4GB) is shipping as of today for a cost of $1495.

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid...e=expert&pid=1
__________________

Last edited by jmke : 15th May 2009 at 08:11.
jmke is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Samsung hard drive problems with Abit AX8 motherboard Angel Blue01 Hardware/Software Problems, Bugs 1 1st July 2009 09:27
Antec Fusion HTPC Shootout jmke WebNews 0 10th October 2008 16:16
Fusion IODrive Benchmarks: 650mb/s write speed jmke WebNews 2 12th September 2008 18:54
INFO: RAM List: What Chips on what Memory jmke FAQ / INFO / HOW-TO 3 23rd April 2005 17:13
Western Digital Answers Customer Call With Entry Into Fast-growing Mobile Hard Drive jmke WebNews 0 6th October 2004 10:10
Crucial Technology Introduces New and Improved Gizmo! Hi-Speed USB Flash Drive Sidney WebNews 0 15th June 2004 20:32
Seagate Rolls Out 400 GB SATA Drives jmke WebNews 0 14th June 2004 23:31
World's first 8x double layer recordable DVD drive and media jmke WebNews 0 17th March 2004 08:35
Unused space on hard drives recovered jmke WebNews 13 10th March 2004 14:24
Hitachi to unveil 400GB drive jmke WebNews 0 10th March 2004 08:24

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:07.


Powered by vBulletin® - Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO