Choosing the Best H55/H57 Motherboard

jmke · 1st February 2010, 13:37

The only way to get dual GPU capabilities from Clarkdale CPUs is to use them in a supporting P55 motherboard. Weird, no? The segregation would make sense if Intel offered the H55 and H57 chipsets to vendors at a substantially reduced price in comparison to P55. Clearly, that's not happening at present, as the H57 costs $3 more than the P55 before you've even put a component on the motherboard.

So where does this leave H57? The only thing it has to offer Clarkdale is a few extra PCI-E lanes, two extra USB ports, and RAID. If you're going to use the IGP, you don't really need the extra PCI-E lanes, which essentially means that you're paying for the option to run RAID on the H57 PCH. We also fail to see the attraction of running a Lynnfield processor in an H57 board; the H57 boards would need to come in at least $20 cheaper than entry level P55 boards, or offer some form of performance enhancement for it to start making sense.

http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3732

Massman · 1st February 2010, 13:52

Reviewer did not do propper research:

Quote:

We've run out of time to explore every angle of IGP performance and QPI ratios in this article, but we will endeavor to cover this angle in a future article if need be. Right now, we'll say it appears that you're going to be BCLK limited south of 170 MHz with the IGP in tow. Subtract another 20MHz off that for 8GB configurations, and bear in mind that you'll need to use low memory speeds, capping you to a maximum of around DDR3-1333MHz with things in their current state.

200BCLK with IGP enabled is not a problem if you know what is causing the instability. I'm disappointed that SO few people actually know what is going on ...

jmke · 1st February 2010, 14:02

I request a counter article outlining this :-)

Massman · 1st February 2010, 14:08

I actually have my mails to Gigabyte as some sort of explanation. It seems even Gigabyte doesn't believe what I'm trying to point out and are asking for "more evidence" ...

I do their R&D, give them the solution for free ... and I have to prove it

thorgal · 1st February 2010, 18:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by jmke

I request a counter article outlining this :-)

ok, so what's going on

? It's not like raja is a greenie so I bet he would like to know too

Massman · 1st February 2010, 18:38

Working on the article and gathering last tests ... there's more to it that what I had in mind first, but then again I did expect it to be more difficult

Massman · 1st February 2010, 19:21

BTW, already got upto 220MHz BCLK

Massman · 1st February 2010, 19:27

220MHz BCLK with IGP enabled

1st February 2010, 13:37	#1
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,458	Choosing the Best H55/H57 Motherboard The only way to get dual GPU capabilities from Clarkdale CPUs is to use them in a supporting P55 motherboard. Weird, no? The segregation would make sense if Intel offered the H55 and H57 chipsets to vendors at a substantially reduced price in comparison to P55. Clearly, that's not happening at present, as the H57 costs $3 more than the P55 before you've even put a component on the motherboard. So where does this leave H57? The only thing it has to offer Clarkdale is a few extra PCI-E lanes, two extra USB ports, and RAID. If you're going to use the IGP, you don't really need the extra PCI-E lanes, which essentially means that you're paying for the option to run RAID on the H57 PCH. We also fail to see the attraction of running a Lynnfield processor in an H57 board; the H57 boards would need to come in at least $20 cheaper than entry level P55 boards, or offer some form of performance enhancement for it to start making sense. http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.aspx?i=3732 __________________

1st February 2010, 14:02	#3
jmke Madshrimp Join Date: May 2002 Location: 7090/Belgium Posts: 78,458	I request a counter article outlining this :-) __________________

1st February 2010, 14:08	#4
Massman [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem Posts: 6,465	I actually have my mails to Gigabyte as some sort of explanation. It seems even Gigabyte doesn't believe what I'm trying to point out and are asking for "more evidence" ... I do their R&D, give them the solution for free ... and I have to prove it __________________

1st February 2010, 18:38	#6
Massman [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem Posts: 6,465	Working on the article and gathering last tests ... there's more to it that what I had in mind first, but then again I did expect it to be more difficult __________________

1st February 2010, 19:21	#7
Massman [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem Posts: 6,465	BTW, already got upto 220MHz BCLK __________________

1st February 2010, 19:27	#8
Massman [M] Reviewer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Waregem Posts: 6,465	220MHz BCLK with IGP enabled Attached Thumbnails __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD6 motherboard review	jmke	WebNews	0	23rd February 2010 09:19
ASUS P7P55 WS SuperComputer Motherboard	jmke	WebNews	0	29th January 2010 15:49
GIGABYTE First With USB 3.0 Motherboard Certification	jmke	WebNews	0	6th January 2010 14:07
Choosing a Motherboard for a Middle-End Machine (Socket AM2)	Sidney	WebNews	0	29th November 2007 04:02
DFI announces their NF680i based motherboard - Best Intel OC board?	jmke	WebNews	0	26th April 2007 14:38
Ars Technica Motherboard Guide: Part I — motherboard fundamentals	jmke	WebNews	1	20th December 2005 17:18
A8N-SLI Premium motherboard with heat pipe design	jmke	WebNews	4	5th June 2005 16:52
AOpen presents world’s first ATX Pentium M motherboard	jmke	WebNews	0	1st June 2005 16:35
Corsair Partners with Tier One Motherboard Manufacturers to Enable nForce4 SLI Intel	jmke	WebNews	0	15th April 2005 08:30
DFI® Targets Enthusiasts with the World's First i875P Chipset Based Motherboard	jmke	WebNews	0	24th September 2004 08:09